The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects

结肠镜检查 医学 无症状的 内科学 结直肠癌 逻辑回归 弗雷明翰风险评分 结直肠腺瘤 腺瘤 前瞻性队列研究 肿瘤科 癌症 疾病
作者
Khay Guan Yeoh,Khek Yu Ho,Han‐Mo Chiu,Feng Zhu,Jessica Y. L. Ching,Deng‐Chyang Wu,Takahisa Matsuda,J S Byeon,Seung‐Koo Lee,Khean‐Lee Goh,Jose D. Sollano,Rungsun Rerknimitr,Rupert W. Leong,Kelvin Tsoi,Jaw‐Town Lin,Joseph J.�Y. Sung
出处
期刊:Gut [BMJ]
卷期号:60 (9): 1236-1241 被引量:269
标识
DOI:10.1136/gut.2010.221168
摘要

Objective

To develop and validate a clinical risk score predictive of risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia for Asia.

Methods

A prospective, cross-sectional and multicentre study was carried out in tertiary hospitals in 11 Asian cities. The subjects comprise 2752 asymptomatic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. From a development set of 860 asymptomatic subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy, multiple logistic regression was applied to identify significant risk factors for advanced colorectal neoplasia defined as invasive carcinoma or advanced adenoma. The ORs for significant risk factors were utilised to develop a risk score ranging from 0 to 7 (Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score). Three tiers of risk were arbitrarily defined: 0–1 'average risk' (AR); 2–3 'moderate risk' (MR); and 4–7 'high risk' (HR). Subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy between July 2006 and December 2007 were prospectively enrolled to form an independent validation group. Each subject had a personal APCS score calculated by summing the points attributed from the presence of risk factors in the individuals. The performance of the APCS score in predicting risk of advanced neoplasia was evaluated.

Results

There were 860 subjects in the derivation set and 1892 subjects in the validation set, with a baseline prevalence of advanced neoplasia of 4.5% and 3%, respectively. Applying the APCS stratification in the validation set, 559 subjects (29.5%) were in the AR tier, 966 subjects (51.1%) in the MR tier and 367 (19.4%) subjects in the HR tier. The prevalence of advanced neoplasia in the AR, MR and HR groups was 1.3, 3.2 and 5.2%, respectively. The subjects in the MR and HR tiers had 2.6-fold (95% CI 1.1 to 6.0) and 4.3-fold (95% CI 1.8 to 10.3) increased prevalence of advanced neoplasia, respectively, than those in the AR tier.

Conclusions

The APCS score based on age, gender, family history and smoking is useful in selecting asymptomatic Asian subjects for priority of colorectal screening.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
LMY完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
李书荣发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
温婉的香水完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
充电宝应助无奈苡采纳,获得10
5秒前
QQ发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
李书荣发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研通AI5应助美满的菠萝采纳,获得10
8秒前
完美世界应助son采纳,获得10
8秒前
Tianling完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
Ww发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
NexusExplorer应助kevin采纳,获得10
15秒前
从容的巧曼完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
StandardR完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
yifan92完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
shaft完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Winks完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
燕燕于飞完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
舒心的幻天完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
含蓄妖丽发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
QQ完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
sowhat完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
luoman5656完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
AMENG完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
Peng0514完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
31秒前
沧笙踏歌应助carbon采纳,获得10
32秒前
zhengly23发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
马某发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
丰富的小甜瓜完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
李琛完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
木木三发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
科研通AI2S应助Yolo采纳,获得10
35秒前
鸡块面发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3965857
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3511158
关于积分的说明 11156654
捐赠科研通 3245772
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1793118
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874230
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804268