亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparing the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia: overview of systematic reviews

度洛西汀 阿米替林 纤维肌痛 医学 心情 生活质量(医疗保健) 系统回顾 精神科 物理疗法 内科学 梅德林 替代医学 政治学 病理 护理部 法学
作者
Áurea Dias de Farias,Luciana Eberle,Tânia Alves Amador,Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol
出处
期刊:Advances in rheumatology [BioMed Central]
卷期号:60 (1) 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1186/s42358-020-00137-5
摘要

Abstract Background Duloxetine and amitriptyline are antidepressants used in the treatment of fibromyalgia. In published systematic reviews, there is no agreement about which drug is more effective and safer. This study aimed to compare evidence of the efficacy and safety of duloxetine compared with amitriptyline in the treatment of adult patients with fibromyalgia. This work contributes to guiding clinicians on the use of duloxetine or amitriptyline for the treatment of fibromyalgia and provides information for public health decision-makers. Methods Overview of systematic reviews of clinical trials comparing duloxetine and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia. The reviews were screened in Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, and SRDR with no restrictions on language and year of publication, considering that the research was conducted in July 2018 and updated until May 2020. The selection was based on the following criteria: adult patients with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia treated with duloxetine or amitriptyline, comparing the efficacy and safety in pain, fatigue, sleep, and mood disorder symptoms and quality of life, in addition to the acceptability of these antidepressants. The methodological quality and strength of evidence were assessed using the AMSTAR and GRADE instruments. Results Eight systematic reviews were selected. Amitriptyline had low evidence for pain, moderate evidence for sleep and fatigue, and high evidence for quality of life. Duloxetine had high quality of evidence in patients with mood disorders. With low evidence, duloxetine has higher acceptability, but is safer in older patients, while amitriptyline is safer for non-elderly individuals. Conclusion Both antidepressants are effective in the treatment of fibromyalgia, differing according to the patient’s symptoms and profile. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42019116101.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
whyzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
橙子完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
zoiaii完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
酷炫葵阴完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
陈一一完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
龙骑士25完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
VDC发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
小郭爱科研完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
科目三应助鳗鱼行天采纳,获得30
44秒前
wszzb完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
合一海盗完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
49秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
50秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
50秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
50秒前
Carlos_Soares完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
fawr完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
乔治韦斯莱完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
hhhhh完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
葛怀锐完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
想学习发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
1分钟前
性温雅完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
鳗鱼行天发布了新的文献求助30
1分钟前
1分钟前
木木彡发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
能干的山雁完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
3080完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
l98916发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
aniywn完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
鳗鱼行天完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI5应助Ni采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
RUSeries发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3671180
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3228098
关于积分的说明 9778330
捐赠科研通 2938347
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1609853
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760473
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735976