Comparing the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia: overview of systematic reviews

度洛西汀 阿米替林 纤维肌痛 医学 心情 生活质量(医疗保健) 系统回顾 精神科 物理疗法 内科学 梅德林 替代医学 护理部 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Áurea Dias de Farias,Luciana Eberle,Tânia Alves Amador,Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol
出处
期刊:Advances in rheumatology [Springer Nature]
卷期号:60 (1) 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1186/s42358-020-00137-5
摘要

Abstract Background Duloxetine and amitriptyline are antidepressants used in the treatment of fibromyalgia. In published systematic reviews, there is no agreement about which drug is more effective and safer. This study aimed to compare evidence of the efficacy and safety of duloxetine compared with amitriptyline in the treatment of adult patients with fibromyalgia. This work contributes to guiding clinicians on the use of duloxetine or amitriptyline for the treatment of fibromyalgia and provides information for public health decision-makers. Methods Overview of systematic reviews of clinical trials comparing duloxetine and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia. The reviews were screened in Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, and SRDR with no restrictions on language and year of publication, considering that the research was conducted in July 2018 and updated until May 2020. The selection was based on the following criteria: adult patients with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia treated with duloxetine or amitriptyline, comparing the efficacy and safety in pain, fatigue, sleep, and mood disorder symptoms and quality of life, in addition to the acceptability of these antidepressants. The methodological quality and strength of evidence were assessed using the AMSTAR and GRADE instruments. Results Eight systematic reviews were selected. Amitriptyline had low evidence for pain, moderate evidence for sleep and fatigue, and high evidence for quality of life. Duloxetine had high quality of evidence in patients with mood disorders. With low evidence, duloxetine has higher acceptability, but is safer in older patients, while amitriptyline is safer for non-elderly individuals. Conclusion Both antidepressants are effective in the treatment of fibromyalgia, differing according to the patient’s symptoms and profile. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42019116101.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
江湖爱你完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
迅速背包发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
街角哭泣发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
田様应助excellent采纳,获得10
3秒前
赘婿应助期末王采纳,获得10
3秒前
menga完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
hahhh7完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
研友_Z72O4n发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
轩辕唯雪完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
包容新蕾发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
从容飞烟完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
傢誠发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
轩辕唯雪发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
王莫为完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
皮包医师发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
笑嘻嘻发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
傢誠完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
excellent发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Scarrt完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
王莫为发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
CodeCraft应助zhangpeng采纳,获得10
15秒前
Hello应助研友_Z72O4n采纳,获得10
17秒前
搞怪网络发布了新的文献求助20
17秒前
WQY发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
好困应助聪明的书翠采纳,获得10
18秒前
皮包医师完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
纸万完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
wwwggg发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
朴素爆米花完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
AoAoo发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Hello应助excellent采纳,获得10
21秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
ISSN 2159-8274 EISSN 2159-8290 1000
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
The Kinetic Nitration and Basicity of 1,2,4-Triazol-5-ones 440
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3159748
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2810660
关于积分的说明 7889023
捐赠科研通 2469717
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1315035
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 630738
版权声明 602012