亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Validation of Arterio Venous Access Stage (AVAS) Classification: A Prospective International Multicentre Study

阶段(地层学) 医学 地质学 古生物学
作者
Kateřina Lawrie,Petr Waldauf,Peter Baláž,Ricardo Lacerda,Emma Aitken,Krzysztof Letachowicz,Mario D’Oria,Stefano Di Bella,Pavel Stasko,António Gomes,Joana Fontaínhas,Matěj Pekař,Alena Srdelic,Franchesco Ianche,Vítor Nunes,Bretislav Fabian,Jennifer Hanko,Agnes Masengu,Cassandra Moran,Damian McGrogan,Andrew Murray,Stephen O’Neill
出处
期刊:Ndt Plus [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:17 (9)
标识
DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae272
摘要

ABSTRACT Background The arteriovenous access stage (AVAS) classification provides evaluation of upper extremity vessels for vascular access (VA) suitability. It divides patients into classes within three main groups: suitable for native fistula (AVAS1) or prosthetic graft (AVAS2), and patients not suitable for conventional native or prosthetic VA (AVAS3). We validated this system on a prospective dataset. Methods A prospective, international observational study (NCT04796558) involved 11 centres from 8 countries. Patient recruitment was from March 2021 to January 2024. Demographic data, risk factors, vessels parameters, VA types, AVAS class and early VA failure were collected. Percentage agreement was used to assess predictive ability of AVAS (comparison of AVAS and created VA) and consistency of AVAS assessment between evaluators. Pearson's Chi-squared test was used for comparison of early failure rate of conventional (predicted by AVAS) and unconventional (not predicted by AVAS) VA. Results From 1034 enrolled patients, 935 had arteriovenous fistula or graft, 99 patients did not undergo VA creation due opting for alternative renal replacement therapies, experiencing health complications, death or non-compliance. AVAS1 had 91.2%, AVAS2 7.2% and AVAS3 1.6% of patients. Agreement between evaluators was 89%. The most frequently created VAs were radial-cephalic (46%) and brachial-cephalic (27%) fistulae. The accuracy of AVAS versus created access was 79%. In comparison, VA predicted by clinicians versus created access was 62.1%. Inaccuracy of AVAS prediction was more common with higher AVAS classes, and the most common reason for inaccuracy was creation of distal VA despite less favourable anatomy (17%). Patients with unconventional VA had higher early failure rate than patients with conventional VA (20% vs 9.3%, respectively, P = .002) Conclusion AVAS is effective in predicting VA creation, but overall accuracy is reduced at higher AVAS classes when the complexity of decision-making increases and proximal vessels require preservation. When AVAS was followed by clinicians, early failure was significantly decreased.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
10秒前
玛琳卡迪马完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
您晓发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
zoloft发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
小二郎应助zoloft采纳,获得30
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助您晓采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
lda发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
zoloft发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
Akim应助zoloft采纳,获得30
3分钟前
lovelife完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
百里青寒完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
4分钟前
七彩光完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
Spring完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
6分钟前
fff发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
giving完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
7分钟前
Spring发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
Lianna完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
asdfqaz完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
Georgechan完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
田様应助fff采纳,获得10
9分钟前
10分钟前
11分钟前
fff发布了新的文献求助10
11分钟前
张小汉完成签到,获得积分10
11分钟前
CUN完成签到,获得积分10
11分钟前
Owen应助fff采纳,获得10
11分钟前
12分钟前
NexusExplorer应助Yogurt采纳,获得10
12分钟前
冬去春来完成签到 ,获得积分10
13分钟前
13分钟前
13分钟前
fff发布了新的文献求助10
13分钟前
在水一方应助fff采纳,获得10
14分钟前
月军完成签到,获得积分10
14分钟前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 1500
Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 3: Primates 805
拟南芥模式识别受体参与调控抗病蛋白介导的ETI免疫反应的机制研究 550
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 500
Digging and Dealing in Eighteenth-Century Rome 500
Queer Politics in Times of New Authoritarianisms: Popular Culture in South Asia 500
Manual of Sewer Condition Classification 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3068122
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2722142
关于积分的说明 7476029
捐赠科研通 2369115
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1256205
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 609490
版权声明 596826