Validation of Arterio Venous Access Stage (AVAS) Classification: A Prospective International Multicentre Study

阶段(地层学) 医学 地质学 古生物学
作者
Kateřina Lawrie,Petr Waldauf,Peter Baláž,Ricardo Lacerda,Emma Aitken,Krzysztof Letachowicz,Mario D’Oria,Stefano Di Bella,Pavel Stasko,António Gomes,Joana Fontaínhas,Matěj Pekař,Alena Srdelic,Franchesco Ianche,Vítor Nunes,Bretislav Fabian,Jennifer Hanko,Agnes Masengu,Cassandra Moran,Damian McGrogan,Andrew Murray,Stephen O’Neill
出处
期刊:Ndt Plus [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:17 (9)
标识
DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae272
摘要

ABSTRACT Background The arteriovenous access stage (AVAS) classification provides evaluation of upper extremity vessels for vascular access (VA) suitability. It divides patients into classes within three main groups: suitable for native fistula (AVAS1) or prosthetic graft (AVAS2), and patients not suitable for conventional native or prosthetic VA (AVAS3). We validated this system on a prospective dataset. Methods A prospective, international observational study (NCT04796558) involved 11 centres from 8 countries. Patient recruitment was from March 2021 to January 2024. Demographic data, risk factors, vessels parameters, VA types, AVAS class and early VA failure were collected. Percentage agreement was used to assess predictive ability of AVAS (comparison of AVAS and created VA) and consistency of AVAS assessment between evaluators. Pearson's Chi-squared test was used for comparison of early failure rate of conventional (predicted by AVAS) and unconventional (not predicted by AVAS) VA. Results From 1034 enrolled patients, 935 had arteriovenous fistula or graft, 99 patients did not undergo VA creation due opting for alternative renal replacement therapies, experiencing health complications, death or non-compliance. AVAS1 had 91.2%, AVAS2 7.2% and AVAS3 1.6% of patients. Agreement between evaluators was 89%. The most frequently created VAs were radial-cephalic (46%) and brachial-cephalic (27%) fistulae. The accuracy of AVAS versus created access was 79%. In comparison, VA predicted by clinicians versus created access was 62.1%. Inaccuracy of AVAS prediction was more common with higher AVAS classes, and the most common reason for inaccuracy was creation of distal VA despite less favourable anatomy (17%). Patients with unconventional VA had higher early failure rate than patients with conventional VA (20% vs 9.3%, respectively, P = .002) Conclusion AVAS is effective in predicting VA creation, but overall accuracy is reduced at higher AVAS classes when the complexity of decision-making increases and proximal vessels require preservation. When AVAS was followed by clinicians, early failure was significantly decreased.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_LwbYv8完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
宇称yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
想看雪的人完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
KBRS完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
耍酷的雪糕完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
暮夕梧桐完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
可爱的函函应助ztt采纳,获得10
3秒前
YXHTCM完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
懵懂的觅夏完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
luis完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
SherlockJia发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
拼搏的似狮完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
刘淼发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
怕孤独的棒球完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
洁净的天德完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
大西瓜完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
张世华发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Jasper应助洁净的士晋采纳,获得10
11秒前
JQKing完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
落雪慕卿颜完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
DDangyl完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
涂鸦少年完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
枕月听松完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
sunnyqqz完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
黑包包大人完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
LYQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
名字有点甜诶完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
顺心完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
Zzz应助曾经的康乃馨采纳,获得10
17秒前
marc107完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
不想读文献的逵完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
辛勤誉完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
郭郭完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
噜噜发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
nwpuwangbo完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
ljw完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Elements of Propulsion: Gas Turbines and Rockets, Second Edition 1000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 1000
Engineering for calcareous sediments : proceedings of the International Conference on Calcareous Sediments, Perth 15-18 March 1988 / edited by R.J. Jewell, D.C. Andrews 1000
Wolffs Headache and Other Head Pain 9th Edition 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6246830
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8070243
关于积分的说明 16846170
捐赠科研通 5322957
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2834296
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1811801
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1667554