检查表
系统回顾
协议(科学)
医学
指南
透明度(行为)
批判性评价
梅德林
荟萃分析
替代医学
医学物理学
计算机科学
病理
计算机安全
心理学
政治学
法学
认知心理学
作者
David Moher,Larissa Shamseer,Mike Clarke,Davina Ghersi,Alessandro Liberati,Mark Petticrew,Paul G Shekelle,Lesley Stewart
标识
DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
摘要
Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI