Revisiting the Ethylene Carbonate–Propylene Carbonate Mystery with Operando Characterization

Abstract The “ethylene carbonate (EC)–propylene carbonate (PC) mystery” has puzzled electrochemists for decades. Surprisingly, the minor structural difference between PC and EC, a methyl vis‐à‐vis a proton, prevents PC unlike EC to form a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on carbon (C), which along with the popularity of PC has impeded the development of Li‐ion batteries with many years. Despite several hypotheses, the fundamental reason remains debated largely due to the lack of sufficient experimental evidence. Herein, SEI formed as a result of EC and PC reductions are analyzed by two state‐of‐the‐art operando techniques, online electrochemical mass spectrometry and electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring. Although both EC‐ and PC‐based electrolytes appear to have virtually identical reaction pathways, PC is reduced much more extensively than EC and forms a much thicker SEI. However, while the SEI derived from EC remains on the electrode, PC reduction products redissolve in the electrolyte leaving the bare C electrode behind. The presented study illustrates the complex scheme of competing electro‐/chemical reactions behind SEI formation and provides further scientific details needed to eventually form a consensus of the processes governing electrode/electrolyte interphases in Li‐ion batteries.