Effects of Liberal vs Restrictive Transfusion Thresholds on Survival and Neurocognitive Outcomes in Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants

医学 神经认知 儿科 低出生体重 重症监护医学 认知 怀孕 精神科 生物 遗传学
作者
Axel R. Franz,Corinna Engel,Dirk Bassler,Mario Rüdiger,Ulrich Thomé,Rolf F. Maier,Ingeborg Krägeloh‐Mann,Martina Kron,Jochen Essers,Christoph Bührer,Georg Rellensmann,Rainer Rossi,Hans-Jörg Bittrich,Claudia Roll,Thomas Höhn,Harald Ehrhardt,Stefan Avenarius,H Körner,Anja Stein,Horst Buxmann,Matthias Vochem,Christian F. Poets,Christian A. Maiwald,Gabriele von Oldershausen,Iris Bergmann,Michael Raubuch,W Buchenau,Birgit Schuler,Silvia Sander,Hans-Ulrich Bucher,Heike Rabe,Josef Högel,Tamam Bakchoul,S. Enkel,R. Hopfner,Manuel Schmid,Steffen Ruess,Helmut Hummler,Maria Zernickel,Christof Dame,Christoph Czernik,Lars Garten,Florian Guthmann,D Hüseman,Elisabeth Walch,Jessica A. Blank,Esther Rieger‐Fackeldey,Claudius Werner,Katja Masjosthusmann,Julia Sandkötter,I Hörnig-Franz,Thomas Kühn,Michael Emeis,Mikosch Wilke,Henriette Schönemann,K. Roefke,Wolfgang Pielemeier,P Kutz,Laura Stüwe‐Kunz,Klaus Lohmeier,Renate Richter‐Werkle,Lars Klein,Dirk Faas,Rangmar Goelz,Jörg Arand,Ingo Müller-Hansen,Karen B. Kreutzer,Cornelia Wiechers,Christoph E. Schwarz,Irene Steiner-Wilke,Ralf Böttger,Claudia Jungbluth-Strauch,J Heindorf,Christoph Härtel,Levente Bejo,Britta Hüning,Rolf Schlößer,Doris Fischer,A. Allendorf,Michael Zemlin,Pia Göbert,Susanne E. Kampmann,Silke Thomsen,Mirjam Wege,Franziska Heinz,Evelyn Grandmontagne,Martin Wagner,Ulrich Pohlmann,Patrick Neuberger,Thomas Strahleck,M Westmeier,Zoubida El Hafid,Iris Kallenberg,Aurelia Giordano,A. Bläser,Corinna Gebauer,Jürgen Seidenberg,Jeannette Dege,Birgitt Moed,Orsolya Genzel‐Boroviczény,Stefanie Artmann,R. Burghard,Mechthild Hubert,Susanne Lüttchens,Bettina Bohnhorst,Corinna Peter,Christoph A. Jacobi,Barbara Seipolt,Violeta Ojinaga,Arite Koch,Beate Walter,Hugo Segerer,Annette Keller-Wackerbauer,Jochen Kittel,Norbert Teig,Susanna Wiegand,A Weitkämper,Dominique Singer,Sarah Kabisch,Monika Wolf,Mark Schoberer,Thorsten Orlikowsky,Sonja Trepels‐Kottek,Victoria Rotering,Catherine Ley,G. Buheitel,Wilfried Schenk,Anne C. Garbe,Matthias Heckmann,Hagen Bahlmann,Stefan Schäfer,Holger Schiffmann,Bettina Behring,Tanja Bauer,Hans‐Georg Topf,Patrick Morhart,Regina Trollmann,Michael Schroth,Angela Kribs,Sandra Zawatzki,A von der Wense,Peter Gudowius,Jes Reinholdt Petersen,Gitte Veiergang,Gorm Greisen,Ulla Christensen,Tine Brink Henriksen,Tuuli Metsvaht,Renáta Polácková
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:324 (6): 560-560 被引量:171
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.10690
摘要

Importance

Red blood cell transfusions are commonly administered to infants weighing less than 1000 g at birth. Evidence-based transfusion thresholds have not been established. Previous studies have suggested higher rates of cognitive impairment with restrictive transfusion thresholds.

Objective

To compare the effect of liberal vs restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies on death or disability.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized clinical trial conducted in 36 level III/IV neonatal intensive care units in Europe among 1013 infants with birth weights of 400 g to 999 g at less than 72 hours after birth; enrollment took place between July 14, 2011, and November 14, 2014, and follow-up was completed by January 15, 2018.

Interventions

Infants were randomly assigned to liberal (n = 492) or restrictive (n = 521) red blood cell transfusion thresholds based on infants' postnatal age and current health state.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome, measured at 24 months of corrected age, was death or disability, defined as any of cognitive deficit, cerebral palsy, or severe visual or hearing impairment. Secondary outcome measures included individual components of the primary outcome, complications of prematurity, and growth.

Results

Among 1013 patients randomized (median gestational age at birth, 26.3 [interquartile range {IQR}, 24.9-27.6] weeks; 509 [50.2%] females), 928 (91.6%) completed the trial. Among infants in the liberal vs restrictive transfusion thresholds groups, respectively, incidence of any transfusion was 400/492 (81.3%) vs 315/521 (60.5%); median volume transfused was 40 mL (IQR, 16-73 mL) vs 19 mL (IQR, 0-46 mL); and weekly mean hematocrit was 3 percentage points higher with liberal thresholds. Among infants in the liberal vs restrictive thresholds groups, the primary outcome occurred in 200/450 (44.4%) vs 205/478 (42.9%), respectively, for a difference of 1.6% (95% CI, −4.8% to 7.9%;P = .72). Death by 24 months occurred in 38/460 (8.3%) vs 44/491 (9.0%), for a difference of −0.7% (95% CI, −4.3% to 2.9%;P = .70), cognitive deficit was observed in 154/410 (37.6%) vs 148/430 (34.4%), for a difference of 3.2% (95% CI, −3.3% to 9.6%;P = .47), and cerebral palsy occurred in 18/419 (4.3%) vs 25/443 (5.6%), for a difference of −1.3% (95% CI, −4.2% to 1.5%;P = .37), in the liberal vs the restrictive thresholds groups, respectively. In the liberal vs restrictive thresholds groups, necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgical intervention occurred in 20/492 (4.1%) vs 28/518 (5.4%); bronchopulmonary dysplasia occurred in 130/458 (28.4%) vs 126/485 (26.0%); and treatment for retinopathy of prematurity was required in 41/472 (8.7%) vs 38/492 (7.7%). Growth at follow-up was also not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among infants with birth weights of less than 1000 g, a strategy of liberal blood transfusions compared with restrictive transfusions did not reduce the likelihood of death or disability at 24 months of corrected age.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01393496
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
chen完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
阿湫发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
崔悦欣发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助kk子采纳,获得10
3秒前
丰富的不惜完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
票子发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
华仔应助魏莱采纳,获得10
5秒前
F123发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
shen发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
苗觉觉完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
帕金森完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
活力的妙芙完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
赘婿应助疯子魔煞采纳,获得10
10秒前
橙橙橙完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
你好CDY完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
万能图书馆应助希尔伯特采纳,获得10
11秒前
我是老大应助123采纳,获得10
12秒前
芒果小鹌鹑完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
上官若男应助F123采纳,获得10
14秒前
Singularity应助邢文瑞采纳,获得10
15秒前
c123发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
嘉嘉琦发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
wanci应助QWDSA采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
愉快静曼发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
乐乐乐乐乐乐应助科学家采纳,获得10
23秒前
99完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
友好傲白完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
FL完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
清新的绿海完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
山色青完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
Research on Disturbance Rejection Control Algorithm for Aerial Operation Robots 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038446
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576149
关于积分的说明 11374627
捐赠科研通 3305875
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819354
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892680
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815048