建筑信息建模
背景(考古学)
过程(计算)
独创性
过程管理
集合(抽象数据类型)
经济短缺
知识管理
计算机科学
成熟度(心理)
建筑业
建筑
工程管理
工程类
建筑工程
运营管理
生物
心理学
政治学
政府(语言学)
调度(生产过程)
法学
程序设计语言
语言学
操作系统
视觉艺术
古生物学
艺术
哲学
发展心理学
创造力
作者
Tito Ceci de Sena,Márcio Minto Fabrício
出处
期刊:Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
[Emerald (MCB UP)]
日期:2022-02-24
卷期号:30 (5): 2101-2123
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1108/ecam-11-2020-0942
摘要
Purpose This study proposes a framework for collaborative building information modeling BIM implementation in construction and development companies in the Brazilian architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) market. The study addresses aspects concerning BIM collaboration, levels of adoption and maturity, classification of BIM objects and use of tools. Design/methodology/approach The study conclusions are based on a bibliographic review and on active participation in a BIM implementation process conducted with two construction and development companies that participated in the study, which allowed examining the practical problems of the elaboration of BIM in various technical specialties, and the proposition of a framework to help overcome these limitations. Findings The research identified the importance of adopting standardized methods to develop models, establishing common classifications for objects to allow the use by different stakeholders on 3D, 4D and 5D processes, in a context that information is scattered and, in many cases, divergent across different companies and even different areas from the same company. Originality/value The study presents a practical set of methods and tools to be used within a context common to the Brazilian AEC market, on which construction and development companies are responsible for the management of the design and construction phase of a building. The recommendations of the research take into account the shortage of nationwide frameworks and classification standards, so it contributes to filling some gaps of current literature that cover theoretical aspects of guidance documents for BIM implementation but do not detail specific practical applications within a determined context. The limitations of the framework proposed are its focus on establishing context-specific guidelines, which may not be suitable universally.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI