风险分析(工程)
弹性(材料科学)
多样性(控制论)
风险评估
风险管理
桥接(联网)
透视图(图形)
可靠性(半导体)
计算机科学
环境资源管理
工程类
业务
计算机安全
环境科学
量子力学
热力学
物理
人工智能
功率(物理)
财务
出处
期刊:Risk Analysis
[Wiley]
日期:2020-06-11
卷期号:40 (11): 2399-2412
被引量:7
摘要
Abstract Reliability and higher levels of safety are thought to be achieved by using systematic approaches to managing risks. The assessment of risks has produced a range of different approaches to assessing these uncertainties, presenting models for how risks affect individuals or organizations. Contemporary risk assessment tools based on this approach have proven difficult for practitioners to use as tools for tactical and operational decision making. This article presents an alternative to these assessments by utilizing a resilience perspective, arguing that complex systems are inclined to variety and uncertainty regarding the results they produce and are therefore prone to systemic failures. A continuous improvement approach is a source of reliability when managing complex systems and is necessary to manage varieties and uncertainties. For an organization to understand how risk events occur, it is necessary to define what is believed to be the equilibrium of the system in time and space. By applying a resilience engineering (RE) perspective to risk assessment, it is possible to manage this complexity by assessing the ability to respond, monitor, learn, and anticipate risks, and in so doing to move away from the flawed frequency and consequences approach. Using a research station network in the Arctic as an example illustrates how an RE approach qualifies assessments by bridging risk assessments with value‐creation processes. The article concludes by arguing that a resilience‐based risk assessment can improve on current practice, including for organizations located outside the Arctic region.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI