情境伦理学
代理(统计)
样品(材料)
复制
心理学
应用心理学
公共关系
业务
社会心理学
政治学
计算机科学
数学
色谱法
统计
机器学习
化学
作者
Xiaoli Lu,Weijie Wang,Hao Xu
标识
DOI:10.1080/14719037.2020.1864014
摘要
This article examines whether convenience samples such as undergraduate students, MPA students, and online subjects can replicate the findings based on public officials in experimental research. We used a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design (High/Low Help-deservingness Clients × With/Without Situational Stress) with scenarios of discretionary decision-making by street-level bureaucrats in China. The four samples showed a consistent pattern in the impact of client help-deservingness on discretionary decision-making, but differed in the effects of situational stress on discretionary decision-making. We suggest that researchers be cautious in using convenience samples as surrogates for professional bureaucrats when the scenarios require professional expertise.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI