荟萃分析
调解
剧痛
颈部疼痛
置信区间
苦恼
物理疗法
临床心理学
系统回顾
医学
心理学
慢性疼痛
梅德林
替代医学
内科学
病理
法学
政治学
作者
Hopin Lee,Markus Hübscher,G. Lorimer Moseley,Steven J. Kamper,Adrian C. Traeger,Gemma Mansell,James H. McAuley
出处
期刊:Pain
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2015-06-01
卷期号:156 (6): 988-997
被引量:423
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000146
摘要
Disability is an important outcome from a clinical and public health perspective. However, it is unclear how disability develops in people with low back pain or neck pain. More specifically, the mechanisms by which pain leads to disability are not well understood. Mediation analysis is a way of investigating these mechanisms by examining the extent to which an intermediate variable explains the effect of an exposure on an outcome. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and examine the extent to which putative mediators explain the effect of pain on disability in people with low back pain or neck pain. Five electronic databases were searched. We found 12 studies (N = 2961) that examined how pain leads to disability with mediation analysis. Standardized regression coefficients (β) of the indirect and total paths were pooled. We found evidence to show that self-efficacy (β = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10 to 0.34), psychological distress (β = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.18), and fear (β = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.14) mediated the relationship between pain and disability, but catastrophizing did not (β = 0.07, 95% CI = −0.06 to 0.19). The methodological quality of these studies was low, and we highlight potential areas for development. Nonetheless, the results suggest that there are significant mediating effects of self-efficacy, psychological distress, and fear, which underpins the direct targeting of these constructs in treatment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI