Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

谵妄 医学 镇静 指南 梅德林 工作队 德尔菲法 重症监护室 分级(工程) 急诊医学 疼痛评估 病危 重症监护医学 危重护理 医疗急救 疼痛管理 物理疗法 麻醉 法学 土木工程 病理 工程类 统计 数学 政治学 公共行政
作者
Juliana Barr,Gilles L. Fraser,Kathleen Puntillo,E. Wesley Ely,Céline Gélinas,Joseph F. Dasta,Judy E. Davidson,John W. Devlin,John P. Kress,Aaron M. Joffe,Douglas B. Coursin,Daniel Herr,Avery Tung,Bryce R.H. Robinson,Dorrie K. Fontaine,Michael A. E. Ramsay,Richard R. Riker,Curtis N. Sessler,Brenda T. Pun,Yoanna Skrobik,Roman Jaeschke
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:41 (1): 263-306 被引量:2742
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182783b72
摘要

To revise the "Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Sustained Use of Sedatives and Analgesics in the Critically Ill Adult" published in Critical Care Medicine in 2002.The American College of Critical Care Medicine assembled a 20-person, multidisciplinary, multi-institutional task force with expertise in guideline development, pain, agitation and sedation, delirium management, and associated outcomes in adult critically ill patients. The task force, divided into four subcommittees, collaborated over 6 yr in person, via teleconferences, and via electronic communication. Subcommittees were responsible for developing relevant clinical questions, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org) to review, evaluate, and summarize the literature, and to develop clinical statements (descriptive) and recommendations (actionable). With the help of a professional librarian and Refworks database software, they developed a Web-based electronic database of over 19,000 references extracted from eight clinical search engines, related to pain and analgesia, agitation and sedation, delirium, and related clinical outcomes in adult ICU patients. The group also used psychometric analyses to evaluate and compare pain, agitation/sedation, and delirium assessment tools. All task force members were allowed to review the literature supporting each statement and recommendation and provided feedback to the subcommittees. Group consensus was achieved for all statements and recommendations using the nominal group technique and the modified Delphi method, with anonymous voting by all task force members using E-Survey (http://www.esurvey.com). All voting was completed in December 2010. Relevant studies published after this date and prior to publication of these guidelines were referenced in the text. The quality of evidence for each statement and recommendation was ranked as high (A), moderate (B), or low/very low (C). The strength of recommendations was ranked as strong (1) or weak (2), and either in favor of (+) or against (-) an intervention. A strong recommendation (either for or against) indicated that the intervention's desirable effects either clearly outweighed its undesirable effects (risks, burdens, and costs) or it did not. For all strong recommendations, the phrase "We recommend …" is used throughout. A weak recommendation, either for or against an intervention, indicated that the trade-off between desirable and undesirable effects was less clear. For all weak recommendations, the phrase "We suggest …" is used throughout. In the absence of sufficient evidence, or when group consensus could not be achieved, no recommendation (0) was made. Consensus based on expert opinion was not used as a substitute for a lack of evidence. A consistent method for addressing potential conflict of interest was followed if task force members were coauthors of related research. The development of this guideline was independent of any industry funding.These guidelines provide a roadmap for developing integrated, evidence-based, and patient-centered protocols for preventing and treating pain, agitation, and delirium in critically ill patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
无忧迪应助知性的绮兰采纳,获得30
1秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
crx发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ff发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
YOMU完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
尊敬飞丹完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
jackwang完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
suanqi512发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小鑫完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助四月晚风采纳,获得10
6秒前
Jasper应助云中鹤采纳,获得50
7秒前
AliHamid完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
WW发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
caq发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
拾柒发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
杜先生完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
卡斯蒂亚发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Glitter关注了科研通微信公众号
12秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
南昌黑人完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
东日完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
monokurodream关注了科研通微信公众号
12秒前
嗯哼举报李k求助涉嫌违规
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
FDY关闭了FDY文献求助
15秒前
熊仔一百完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助30
15秒前
土豆金完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
8R60d8应助龙行天下采纳,获得20
15秒前
高分求助中
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 2000
The Lali Section: An Excellent Reference Section for Upper - Devonian in South China 1500
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 870
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
Fundamentals of Dispersed Multiphase Flows 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3254512
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2896718
关于积分的说明 8294056
捐赠科研通 2565699
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1393246
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 652443
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 630000