已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

High-dose methotrexate with or without whole brain radiotherapy for primary CNS lymphoma (G-PCNSL-SG-1): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial

医学 放射治疗 甲氨蝶呤 原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤 化疗 养生 化疗方案 肿瘤科 内科学 外科
作者
Eckhard Thiel,Agnieszka Korfel,Peter Martus,Lothar Kanz,Frank Griesinger,Michael Rauch,Alexander Röth,Bernd Hertenstein,Theda von Toll,Thomas Hundsberger,H.‐G. Mergenthaler,Malte Leithäuser,Tobias Birnbaum,Lars Fischer,Kristoph Jahnke,Ulrich Herrlinger,Ludwig Plaßwilm,Thomas Nägele,Torsten Pietsch,Michael Bamberg
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:11 (11): 1036-1047 被引量:595
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70229-1
摘要

Background High-dose methotrexate is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma. The role of whole brain radiotherapy is controversial because delayed neurotoxicity limits its acceptance as a standard of care. We aimed to investigate whether first-line chemotherapy based on high-dose methotrexate was non-inferior to the same chemotherapy regimen followed by whole brain radiotherapy for overall survival. Methods Immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma were enrolled from 75 centres and treated between May, 2000, and May, 2009. Patients were allocated by computer-generated block randomisation to receive first-line chemotherapy based on high-dose methotrexate with or without subsequent whole brain radiotherapy, with stratification by age (<60 vs ≥60 years) and institution (Berlin vs Tübingen vs all other sites). The biostatistics centre assigned patients to treatment groups and informed local centres by fax; physicians and patients were not masked to treatment group after assignment. Patients enrolled between May, 2000, and August, 2006, received high-dose methotrexate (4 g/m2) on day 1 of six 14-day cycles; thereafter, patients received high-dose methotrexate plus ifosfamide (1·5 g/m2) on days 3–5 of six 14-day cycles. In those assigned to receive first-line chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 45 Gy, in 30 fractions of 1·5 Gy given daily on weekdays. Patients allocated to first-line chemotherapy without whole brain radiotherapy who had not achieved complete response were given high-dose cytarabine. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and analysis was per protocol. Our hypothesis was that the omission of whole brain radiotherapy does not compromise overall survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 0·9. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153530. Findings 551 patients (median age 63 years, IQR 55–69) were enrolled and randomised, of whom 318 were treated per protocol. In the per-protocol population, median overall survival was 32·4 months (95% CI 25·8–39·0) in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy (n=154), and 37·1 months (27·5–46·7) in those not receiving whole brain radiotherapy (n=164), hazard ratio 1·06 (95% CI 0·80–1·40; p=0·71). Thus our primary hypothesis was not proven. Median progression-free survival was 18·3 months (95% CI 11·6–25·0) in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy, and 11·9 months (7·3–16·5; p=0·14) in those not receiving whole brain radiotherapy. Treatment-related neurotoxicity in patients with sustained complete response was more common in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy (22/45, 49% by clinical assessment; 35/49, 71% by neuroradiology) than in those who did not (9/34, 26%; 16/35, 46%). Interpretation No significant difference in overall survival was recorded when whole brain radiotherapy was omitted from first-line chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma, but our primary hypothesis was not proven. The progression-free survival benefit afforded by whole brain radiotherapy has to be weighed against the increased risk of neurotoxicity in long-term survivors. Funding German Cancer Aid.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI5应助清秀帆布鞋采纳,获得30
刚刚
1秒前
的更换为完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
Vicky完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
副本完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
miumiu完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
沉默的便当完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
司空天德发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
慕青应助bio采纳,获得10
9秒前
龅牙苏发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
JonStark发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
迷人的Jack发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
泡泡糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
xjx发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
炳楷发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
decade发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
龅牙苏完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
Ye发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
传奇3应助炳楷采纳,获得10
19秒前
decade完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
JonStark完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
happy完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
caffeine发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
不想吃辣发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
Wangyingjie5完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
蝴蝶与猫关注了科研通微信公众号
29秒前
失眠依珊完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
gm9915完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
32秒前
皮夏寒发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
网络安全 SEMI 标准 ( SEMI E187, SEMI E188 and SEMI E191.) 1000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Two New β-Class Milbemycins from Streptomyces bingchenggensis: Fermentation, Isolation, Structure Elucidation and Biological Properties 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4609957
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4016141
关于积分的说明 12434394
捐赠科研通 3697550
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2038844
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1071812
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 955502