食管切除术
医学
淋巴结切除术
外科
食管癌
放化疗
癌
新辅助治疗
食道疾病
围手术期
阶段(地层学)
存活率
淋巴结
食管
内科学
癌症
化疗
乳腺癌
古生物学
生物
作者
Po‐Kuei Hsu,Ling‐I Chien,Lin‐Chi Chuang,Yi‐Ying Lee,Chien‐Sheng Huang,Han‐Shui Hsu,Yu‐Chung Wu,Wen-Hu Hsu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.01.016
摘要
The optimal type of esophagectomy and extent of lymphadenectomy for patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma remain controversial. We hypothesized that a more radical resection is associated with better survival.Data of patients who received nCRT followed by resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed. Modified en bloc esophagectomy (mEBE) involves total mediastinal lymphadenectomy and resection of all periesophageal node-bearing tissues. Perioperative outcomes and survival rates of mEBE were compared with those of conventional esophagectomy (CE).A total of 238 patients were included. Compared with CE, mEBE was associated with a longer operative time, higher total number of resected lymph nodes, fewer complications, and less anastomotic leakage; length of stay was similar between the 2 groups. There was no difference in overall survival rates between patients with ypT0 N0 stage in the mEBE and CE groups; however, in patients with non-ypT0 N0 stage in the mEBE and CE groups, the 3-year overall survival rates were 58.5% and 28.5%, respectively (P < .001). On disease-free survival analysis, no difference was observed in patients with ypT0 N0 stage, whereas patients with non-ypT0 N0 stage after nCRT had significantly better disease-free survival after mEBE compared with CE (49.7% vs 27.2%; P = .017).Survival after mEBE was significantly better than that after CE. The mEBE did not increase postoperative hospital stay and complication rates.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI