众包
新颖性
潜在Dirichlet分配
计算机科学
集合(抽象数据类型)
潜在语义分析
人工智能
机器学习
自然语言处理
概率潜在语义分析
主题模型
代表(政治)
计算模型
情报检索
数据科学
心理学
万维网
社会心理学
政治
政治学
法学
程序设计语言
作者
Kai Wang,Boxiang Dong,Junjie Ma
标识
DOI:10.1080/10400419.2023.2187544
摘要
In crowdsourcing ideation websites, companies can easily collect large amount of ideas. Screening through such volume of ideas is very costly and challenging, necessitating automatic approaches. It would be particularly useful to automatically evaluate idea novelty since companies commonly seek novel ideas. Four computational approaches were tested, based on Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), term frequency – inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), and Global Vectors for Word Representation (GloVe), respectively. These approaches were used on three set of ideas and the computed idea novelty scores, along with crowd evaluation, were compared with human expert evaluation. The computational methods do not differ significantly with regard to correlation coefficients with expert ratings, even though TF-IDF-based measure achieved a correlation above 0.40 in two out of the three tasks. Crowd evaluation outperforms all the computational methods. Overall, our results show that the tested computational approaches do not match human judgment well enough to replace it.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI