盒内非相干运动
重复性
再现性
核医学
组内相关
医学
有效扩散系数
磁共振弥散成像
变异系数
磁共振成像
数学
核磁共振
放射科
物理
统计
作者
Juan A. Vasquez,Marissa Brown,Mary Woolsey,Mohammad Abdul‐Ghani,Venkata S. Katabathina,Shengwen Deng,John Blangero,Geoffrey D. Clarke
摘要
Background Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) has potential for evaluating hepatic fibrosis but image acquisition technique influence on diffusion parameter estimation bears investigation. Purpose To minimize variability and maximize repeatably in abdominal DWI in terms of IVIM parameter estimates. Study Type Prospective test–retest and image quality comparison. Subjects Healthy volunteers (3F/7M, 29.9 ± 12.9 years) and Family Study subjects (18F/12M, 51.7 ± 16.7 years), without and with liver steatosis. Field Strength/Sequence Abdominal single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) and simultaneous multi‐slice (SMS) DWI sequences with respiratory triggering (RT), breath‐holding (BH), and navigator echo (NE) at 3 Tesla. Assessment SMS‐BH, EPI‐NE, and SMS‐RT data from twice‐scanned healthy volunteers were analyzed using 6 × b ‐values (0–800 s⋅mm −2 ) and lower (LO) and higher (HI) b ‐value ranges. Family Study subjects were scanned using SMS and standard EPI sequences. The biexponential IVIM model was used to estimate fast‐diffusion coefficient ( D f ), fraction of fast diffusion ( f ), and slow‐diffusion coefficient ( D s ). Scan time, estimated signal‐to‐noise ratio (eSNR), eSNR per acquisition, and distortion ratio were compared. Statistical Tests Coefficients of variation (CoV) and Bland Altman analyses were performed for test–retest repeatability. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed interobserver agreement with P < 0.05 deemed significant. Results Within‐subject CoVs among volunteers (N = 10) for f and D s were lowest in EPI‐NE‐LO (11.6%) and SMS‐RT‐HI (11.1%). Inter‐observer ICCs for f and D s were highest for EPI‐NE‐LO (0.63) and SMS‐RT‐LO (0.76). D f could not be estimated for most subjects. Estimated eSNR (EPI = 21.9, SMS = 4.7) and eSNR time (EPI = 6.7, SMS = 16.6) were greater for SMS, with less distortion in the liver region (DR‐PE: EPI = 23.6, SMS = 13.1). Data Conclusion Simultaneous multislice acquisitions had significantly less variability and higher ICCs of D s , higher eSNR, less distortion, and reduced scan time compared to EPI. Evidence Level 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 1
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI