Development and validation of a new algorithm for improved cardiovascular risk prediction

医学 弗雷明翰风险评分 置信区间 疾病 肺癌 风险评估 内科学 计算机科学 计算机安全
作者
Julia Hippisley‐Cox,Carol Coupland,Mona Bafadhel,Richard Russell,Aziz Sheikh,Peter Brindle,Keith M. Channon
出处
期刊:Nature Medicine [Springer Nature]
卷期号:30 (5): 1440-1447 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41591-024-02905-y
摘要

Abstract QRISK algorithms use data from millions of people to help clinicians identify individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Here, we derive and externally validate a new algorithm, which we have named QR4, that incorporates novel risk factors to estimate 10-year CVD risk separately for men and women. Health data from 9.98 million and 6.79 million adults from the United Kingdom were used for derivation and validation of the algorithm, respectively. Cause-specific Cox models were used to develop models to predict CVD risk, and the performance of QR4 was compared with version 3 of QRISK, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores. We identified seven novel risk factors in models for both men and women (brain cancer, lung cancer, Down syndrome, blood cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, oral cancer and learning disability) and two additional novel risk factors in women (pre-eclampsia and postnatal depression). On external validation, QR4 had a higher C statistic than QRISK3 in both women (0.835 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.833–0.837) and 0.831 (95% CI, 0.829–0.832) for QR4 and QRISK3, respectively) and men (0.814 (95% CI, 0.812–0.816) and 0.812 (95% CI, 0.810–0.814) for QR4 and QRISK3, respectively). QR4 was also more accurate than the ASCVD and SCORE2 risk scores in both men and women. The QR4 risk score identifies new risk groups and provides superior CVD risk prediction in the United Kingdom compared with other international scoring systems for CVD risk.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
香蕉大侠完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
H哈完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
一生所爱发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
国星求助完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
发发发完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
大个应助讨厌乐跑采纳,获得10
6秒前
goodsheep完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6应助Ayuyu采纳,获得10
7秒前
FashionBoy应助李娜采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
Bosen完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
DARLING002完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
小海棉完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
memory发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
文静的代灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Velvet完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Mic应助zora采纳,获得10
15秒前
科研通AI6应助WYH采纳,获得10
15秒前
zy发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
mmichaell发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
干脆小饼干完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
你在看什么28完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
Aurora发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
聪子完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
syy666完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
酷波er应助野性的沉鱼采纳,获得10
24秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助曾叫兽采纳,获得10
24秒前
婷123发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
duou发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
Introduction to Early Childhood Education 1000
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 871
Alloy Phase Diagrams 500
A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 3rd Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5419816
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4535115
关于积分的说明 14148184
捐赠科研通 4451854
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2441909
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1433475
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1410681