B88 Comparison of suprainguinal fascia iliaca block with control group in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study

医学 随机对照试验 可视模拟标度 麻醉 关节置换术 全髋关节置换术 止痛药 外科
作者
Mantė Eidininkienė,A Gelmanas,G Aldakauskaitė
标识
DOI:10.1136/rapm-2022-esra.163
摘要

Background and Aims

Postoperative pain management after major orthopedic surgeries such as total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the biggest considerations [1]. Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) might be beneficial for postoperative pain control after THA, but the value persists controversial [2]. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study aimed to investigate the analgesic efficiency of SFIB after THA compared to control group (C).

Methods

LUHS Bioethics Committee granted the research (No. BEC-MF-250). 36 patients scheduled for THA were randomized into two groups: 16 in SFIB and 20 in C group. After the operation, a blinded observer recorded pain, extent of motor block (Bromage scale), opioid consumption and additional painkillers. Evaluation of pain: at 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, patients were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) on the operated leg at rest, in active and passive 45° flexion positions.

Results

36 patients were assessed, 19 (52,8%) men and 17 (47,2%) women. There were no differences between the groups with respect to demographics. Opioid consumption after 24 hours postoperatively was reduced in SFIB group, unfortunately not statistically significantly (p>0,05). The VAS scores at rest and in motion also were similar at all-time points as well as the extent of motor block. Consumption of additional painkillers was less after 24 hours in SFIB (38,9%) than C (50%) and after 48 hours SFIB (27,8%), C (44,4%) but statistically insignificant (p>0,05).

Conclusions

We conclude that postoperative pain management with SFIB may be valuable after THA. However, a larger study is needed to make the data more reliable.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
echo发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Ehan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
小蘑菇应助不安善若采纳,获得10
1秒前
Flowey发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
田镓栋发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Yolen LI完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
cobo完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
xiaoguo发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
LisA__发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
金角大王完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
也无风雨也无晴完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
hsa_ID发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Justtry发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Flowey完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
丘比特应助fortune采纳,获得10
14秒前
田镓栋完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
greatsnow发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
白开水完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
guozizi发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
xiaoguo完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
华仔应助yoyo采纳,获得10
17秒前
熊儒恒完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
魏强发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
理躺丁真完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
Criminology34应助赶路人采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
zeannezg发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Dun完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
zyt完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
Comprehensive Toxicology Fourth Edition 24000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Hydrothermal Circulation and Seawater Chemistry: Links and Feedbacks 1200
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
World Nuclear Fuel Report: Global Scenarios for Demand and Supply Availability 2025-2040 800
Risankizumab Versus Ustekinumab For Patients with Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: Results from the Phase 3B SEQUENCE Study 600
Oxford Learner's Pocket Word Skills 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5153393
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4348981
关于积分的说明 13540659
捐赠科研通 4191526
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2299002
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1298954
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1243960