折射
验光服务
多焦点人工晶状体
眼科
医学
光学
超声乳化术
物理
视力
作者
Carlo Bellucci,Paolo Mora,Salvatore Tedesco,Stefano Gandolfi,Roberto Bellucci
出处
期刊:Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2023-04-27
卷期号:49 (6): 642-648
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001186
摘要
Automated refraction (Scheiner principle) is universally used to start a visual examination. Although the results are reliable in eyes implanted with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs), they may be less precise with multifocal (mIOL) or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs and can even indicate a refractive error that does not clinically exist. Autorefractor results with monofocal, multifocal, and EDOF IOLs were investigated through literature search analyzing the papers reporting the difference between automated and clinical refraction. The average difference ranged between −0.50 diopter (D) and −1.00 D with most mIOL and EDOF IOLs. The differences in astigmatism were generally much lower. Autorefractors using infrared light cannot measure eyes with high technology IOLs precisely because of the influence of the refractive or of the diffractive near add. The systematic error induced with some IOLs should be mentioned in the IOL label to prevent possible inappropriate refractive procedures to treat apparent myopia.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI