European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion

医学 指南 溶栓 冲程(发动机) 随机对照试验 基底动脉 人口 投票 重症监护医学 外科 内科学 心肌梗塞 病理 工程类 政治学 法学 环境卫生 政治 机械工程
作者
Daniel Strbian,Georgios Tsivgoulis,Johanna M. Ospel,Silja Räty,Petra Cimflová,Georgios Georgiopoulos,Teresa Ullberg,Caroline Arquizan,Jan Gralla,Kamil Zeleňák,Salman Hussain,Jens Fiehler,Patrik Michel,Guillaume Turc,Wim H. van Zwam
出处
期刊:Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery [BMJ]
卷期号:16 (9): e7-e7 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-022053
摘要

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the acute management of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). These guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the ESO and according to the GRADE methodology. Although BAO accounts for only 1–2% of all strokes, it has very poor natural outcome. We identified 10 relevant clinical situations and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions, based on which a systematic literature search and review was performed. The working group consisted of 10 voting members (five representing ESO and five representing the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT)) and three non-voting junior members. The certainty of evidence was generally very low. In many PICOs, available data were scarce or lacking, hence, we provided expert consensus statements. First, we compared intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to no IVT, but specific BAO-related data do not exist. Yet, historically, IVT was standard of care for BAO patients who were also included (although in small numbers) in IVT trials. Non-randomized studies of IVT-only cohorts showed a high proportion of favorable outcomes. Expert Consensus suggests using IVT up to 24 hours unless otherwise contraindicated. We further suggest IVT plus endovascular treatment (EVT) over direct EVT. EVT on top of best medical treatment (BMT) was compared with BMT alone within 6 and 6–24 hours from last seen well. In both time windows, we observed a different effect of treatment depending on a) the region where the patients were treated (Europe vs Asia), b) on the proportion of IVT in the BMT arm, and c) on the initial stroke severity. In case of high proportion of IVT in the BMT group and in patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score below 10, EVT plus BMT was not found better than BMT alone. Based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest EVT+BMT over BMT alone (this is based on results of patients with at least 10 NIHSS points and a low proportion of IVT in BMT). For patients with an NIHSS score below 10, we found no evidence to recommend EVT over BMT. In fact, BMT was non-significantly better and safer than EVT. Furthermore, we found a stronger treatment effect of EVT+BMT over BMT alone in proximal and middle locations of BAO compared with distal location. While recommendations for patients without extensive early ischemic changes in the posterior fossa can, in general, follow those of other PICOs, we formulated an Expert Consensus Statement suggesting against reperfusion therapy in those with extensive bilateral and/or brainstem ischemic changes. Another Expert Consensus suggests reperfusion therapy regardless of collateral scores. Based on limited evidence, we suggest direct aspiration over stent retriever as the first-line strategy of mechanical thrombectomy. As an Expert Consensus, we suggest rescue percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting after a failed EVT procedure. Finally, based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest add-on antithrombotic treatment during EVT or within 24 hours after EVT in patients with no concomitant IVT and in whom EVT was complicated (defined as failed or imminent re-occlusion, or need for additional stenting or angioplasty).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
稚祎完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
2秒前
弧光完成签到 ,获得积分0
6秒前
dmm完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
佳期如梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
展会恩完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
干将莫邪完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
执着夏岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
16秒前
lhn完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
饱满烙完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
菓小柒完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
20秒前
hongxing liu发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
Dongjie发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
杨永佳666完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
Lisztan完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
Tysonqu完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
萤火虫完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
饱满的新之完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
songyu完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
35秒前
黑苹果完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
孙总完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
健壮仙人掌完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
鲸鱼打滚完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
45秒前
hongxing liu完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
紫金之巅完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
快乐的90后fjk完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
漂亮的忆文完成签到,获得积分10
53秒前
蜗牛完成签到 ,获得积分10
55秒前
科研通AI2S应助hongxing liu采纳,获得10
58秒前
haochi完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Gavin完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
fatcat完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
qianci2009完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
徐旖旎完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 600
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3968559
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3513358
关于积分的说明 11167370
捐赠科研通 3248804
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1794465
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 875116
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804664