European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion

医学 指南 溶栓 冲程(发动机) 随机对照试验 基底动脉 人口 投票 重症监护医学 外科 内科学 心肌梗塞 病理 工程类 政治学 法学 环境卫生 政治 机械工程
作者
Daniel Strbian,Georgios Tsivgoulis,Johanna M. Ospel,Silja Räty,Petra Cimflová,Georgios Georgiopoulos,Teresa Ullberg,Caroline Arquizan,Jan Gralla,Kamil Zeleňák,Salman Hussain,Jens Fiehler,Patrik Michel,Guillaume Turc,Wim H. van Zwam
出处
期刊:Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery [BMJ]
卷期号:16 (9): e7-e7 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-022053
摘要

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the acute management of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). These guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the ESO and according to the GRADE methodology. Although BAO accounts for only 1–2% of all strokes, it has very poor natural outcome. We identified 10 relevant clinical situations and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions, based on which a systematic literature search and review was performed. The working group consisted of 10 voting members (five representing ESO and five representing the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT)) and three non-voting junior members. The certainty of evidence was generally very low. In many PICOs, available data were scarce or lacking, hence, we provided expert consensus statements. First, we compared intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to no IVT, but specific BAO-related data do not exist. Yet, historically, IVT was standard of care for BAO patients who were also included (although in small numbers) in IVT trials. Non-randomized studies of IVT-only cohorts showed a high proportion of favorable outcomes. Expert Consensus suggests using IVT up to 24 hours unless otherwise contraindicated. We further suggest IVT plus endovascular treatment (EVT) over direct EVT. EVT on top of best medical treatment (BMT) was compared with BMT alone within 6 and 6–24 hours from last seen well. In both time windows, we observed a different effect of treatment depending on a) the region where the patients were treated (Europe vs Asia), b) on the proportion of IVT in the BMT arm, and c) on the initial stroke severity. In case of high proportion of IVT in the BMT group and in patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score below 10, EVT plus BMT was not found better than BMT alone. Based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest EVT+BMT over BMT alone (this is based on results of patients with at least 10 NIHSS points and a low proportion of IVT in BMT). For patients with an NIHSS score below 10, we found no evidence to recommend EVT over BMT. In fact, BMT was non-significantly better and safer than EVT. Furthermore, we found a stronger treatment effect of EVT+BMT over BMT alone in proximal and middle locations of BAO compared with distal location. While recommendations for patients without extensive early ischemic changes in the posterior fossa can, in general, follow those of other PICOs, we formulated an Expert Consensus Statement suggesting against reperfusion therapy in those with extensive bilateral and/or brainstem ischemic changes. Another Expert Consensus suggests reperfusion therapy regardless of collateral scores. Based on limited evidence, we suggest direct aspiration over stent retriever as the first-line strategy of mechanical thrombectomy. As an Expert Consensus, we suggest rescue percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting after a failed EVT procedure. Finally, based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest add-on antithrombotic treatment during EVT or within 24 hours after EVT in patients with no concomitant IVT and in whom EVT was complicated (defined as failed or imminent re-occlusion, or need for additional stenting or angioplasty).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
蓝意完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
xiaohongmao完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
9秒前
qweerrtt完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
与共发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
carly完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
颢懿完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
24秒前
ljc完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
Java完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
31秒前
鲤鱼安青完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
33秒前
dollarpuff完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
36秒前
mmmmmMM完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
luckweb完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
猫的毛完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
nicky完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
麦子完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
52秒前
Wilson完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
luckweb发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
53秒前
57秒前
1分钟前
传奇3应助wujiwuhui采纳,获得10
1分钟前
开心寄松完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
北宫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
wansida完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
QXS完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
菠萝完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
领导范儿应助Villanellel采纳,获得10
1分钟前
wintersss完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
尹尹发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038066
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575779
关于积分的说明 11373801
捐赠科研通 3305584
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819239
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022