医学
败血症
菌血症
死亡率
重症监护室
安慰剂
内科学
阿帕奇II
随机对照试验
多器官功能障碍综合征
外科
抗生素
病理
生物
微生物学
替代医学
作者
Sheila M. Willatts,Sheila FIMLS Radford,Maria Leitermann
标识
DOI:10.1097/00003246-199506000-00007
摘要
Objective To assess the benefit gained from administration of the antiendotoxic drug, taurolidine, on outcome in critically ill patients with sepsis syndrome. Design A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Setting The general intensive therapy unit in a university teaching hospital. Patients One hundred patients admitted with sepsis syndrome over a 2-yr period. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive the amino-acid derivative, taurolidine, or an identically presented placebo. Measurements and Main Results Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), sepsis, and organ failure scores were measured daily. Blood for culture and endotoxin assay (using the limulus amoebocyte lysate assay) was sampled every 12 hrs for up to 5 days. Hemodynamic variables were recorded every 4 hrs. Forty-nine patients received taurolidine and 51 patients received placebo. There was no difference in APACHE II score, Sepsis Score, or presence of infections between the groups. The frequency of Gram-negative bacteremia was low at 12%. There was no difference in endotoxin activity, clinical or bacteriologic outcome, resolution of organ failure, or mortality rate between groups. Predicted risk of death for patients receiving taurolidine was 45%, and the actual mortality rate was 44%. In the group that received placebo, the predicted mortality rate was 38% and the actual mortality rate was 39%. Conclusion Taurolidine had no beneficial therapeutic effect on the outcome of patients admitted to the intensive therapy unit with sepsis syndrome, using clinical, bacteriologic outcomes, progression of endotoxemia, resolution of organ failure, and 28-day mortality rate as end points. (Crit Care Med 1995; 23:1033-1039)
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI