面部表情
收敛有效性
观察研究
面部动作编码系统
非语言交际
表面有效性
标准效度
心理学
表达式(计算机科学)
内容有效性
可靠性(半导体)
认知心理学
心理测量学
听力学
发展心理学
医学
结构效度
沟通
病理
计算机科学
功率(物理)
物理
程序设计语言
量子力学
内部一致性
作者
Julie Chang,Judith Versloot,Samantha Fashler,Kalie N. McCrystal,Kenneth D. Craig
标识
DOI:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000103
摘要
Assessing pain in young children requires astute judgment by observers. Multidimensional observational scales for pediatric pain contribute by providing behavioral cues believed to characterize pain in children; yet, few measurement items have undergone rigorous psychometric evaluation. This is the case with facial expression, which has been widely recognized as the most sensitive and specific nonverbal indicator of pain. The criteria for identifying facial expressions of pain differ substantially across scales and are frequently inconsistent with empirical descriptions.The present study compared observer ratings of children's (aged 1 to 6 y, inclusive) videotaped postoperative pain reactions using the facial activity items from 6 widely used pediatric pain assessment scales and an anatomically based and empirically validated measure, the Child Facial Coding System. We hypothesized that facial expression items that did not correspond to empirical descriptions would lead to less reliable and divergent pain estimates. Intercoder reliability, criterion validity (empirical and convergent), content validity, and face validity were examined.Findings supported hypotheses and indicated that variation in cues proposed for assessing facial expression led to widely ranging scores that could be insensitive to differences in children's pain intensity.The facial items varied considerably in coder judgment reliability as well as criterion (empirical and convergent), content, and face validity. Observational scales should provide behavioral cues that correspond to empirical descriptions of the facial expression of pain.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI