Factors Associated With Parents Asking Other Parents About Firearms in the Home

医学 自杀预防 人为因素与人体工程学 伤害预防 职业安全与健康 毒物控制 医疗急救 病理
作者
Samaa Kemal,Carly G. Menker,Tyler Lennon,Michelle L. Macy,Karen Sheehan,Megan M. Attridge,Audrey Brewer,Marie E. Heffernan
出处
期刊:Pediatrics [American Academy of Pediatrics]
卷期号:154 (6)
标识
DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-068061
摘要

Children living in homes with firearms face an increased risk of injuries.1,2 Approximately 40% of US households with children have a firearm in the home, yet only 44% of these households store firearms locked and unloaded, in the most secure possible manner.3,4 The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends counseling families regarding firearm injury prevention, including asking about firearms in places children visit (eg, playdates).1 The extent to which parents ask about firearms before playdates is unknown. In this study, we sought to determine if Illinois parents had ever asked about the presence of unlocked firearms in the homes their children visit.Data were collected in the fall of 2023 via online surveys administered in English and Spanish by using Qualtrics (Supplemental Information). Eligible respondents were 18 years or older, residing in Illinois, and the parent, stepparent, or guardian (hereafter called "parent") of at least 1 child <18 years old. To assess whether parents had asked other parents about firearms in the home, we asked the following question: "Have you ever asked another parent whether there is an unlocked firearm present in the home before your child had a playdate or went to a friend's home?" (yes/no). If a parent responded "no," they were asked an open-ended follow-up question: "Can you tell us why you haven't asked this?" Parents reported their self-identified age, gender, race and ethnicity, education level, household income, zip code, and children's ages. Given the differential risk of unintentional firearm injury across racial and ethnic groups in the United States,5 we assessed for differences in asking about firearms across these socially defined groups, which may inform targeted public health interventions. We calculated χ2 statistics to examine differences by demographic characteristics. Free-text responses were reviewed and grouped into themes by the study authors. The home institutional review board determined that the study was exempt.Survey responses were received from 1000 Illinois parents (Table 1). Most parents were female (65.5%), non-Hispanic white (59.4%), between 31 and 40 years old (46.9%), and from an urban region (81.6%). Most parents (61.5%) had never asked another parent about the presence of an unlocked firearm in their home. There was a lower likelihood of female parents reporting asking about firearms compared with male parents (33.6% vs 47.6%, P < .001), parents living in rural areas compared with those living in urban areas (25.7% vs 41.4%, P < .001), parents 41 to 50 years old (25.4%) and >50 years old (32.4%) compared with parents 18 to 30 years old (41.5%) and 31 to 40 years old (43.0%, P < .001), parents with a high school degree (34.1%) or some college (31.6%) compared with parents with a college degree (48.8%, P < .001), and parents with a household income of <$30 000 (33.9%) or $30 000 to $124 999 (36.4%) compared with those with a household income of $125 000 or higher (50.8%, P < .001). There were no differences based on parent race and ethnicity or the ages of the children in the home. The top reasons parents had not asked about firearms in the home included (1) never thought about it before (23.5%), (2) child does not attend playdates (21.9%), and (3) did not feel the question was appropriate to ask (9.8%) (Table 2).We found that most sampled Illinois parents did not ask other parents about the presence of unlocked firearms within their homes. Many parents reported they had not asked about firearms because it never occurred to them to do so. This highlights a critical need to raise awareness of this important question. Given that certain groups were found to ask about firearms less, targeted and culturally appropriate messaging through broader, accessible channels (eg, public service announcements, social media) is needed.Among children 0 to 14 years old, almost 20% of unintentional firearm-related deaths occur at a friend's home.6 Therefore, although counseling parents about the secure storage of firearms within their own homes is vital, limiting counseling to this topic may neglect to address a high-risk location for childhood firearm injury. Child health care professionals can model how parents may initiate these conversations with other parents, including by using open communication with direct questions (ie, the presence of a firearm in the home and related storage methods) and approaching the topic in the same way they would other child health and safety topics (eg, supervision, allergies).1,7,8Study limitations include the use of self-reported data, which may be susceptible to recall bias and social desirability bias, potentially leading to the overestimation of respondents asking about firearms. We only assessed whether parents had ever asked about firearms, not the frequency or consistency of this practice. Our sample is from a single state, which may limit generalizability.Child health care professionals should ask parents about the presence of firearms in all homes in which children live and play. The authors of future studies may examine the effectiveness of anticipatory guidance on parental conversations around firearm safety in the homes their children visit.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
wanci应助孟丽敏采纳,获得10
刚刚
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
莲子粥发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
qq应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
haitun发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
guozizi应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
2秒前
2秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
2秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
个性的饼干完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
酷波er应助外科医生采纳,获得10
3秒前
qq应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
彭于晏应助CIOOICO1采纳,获得10
3秒前
狂野的微笑完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
黑色幽默发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
无心的怜烟完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
研友_850EYZ发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
笑点低鸡翅完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
wxy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
melisa发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
顾矜应助Ryan123采纳,获得30
7秒前
圆圆方方完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
逍遥发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
我是老大应助qcf采纳,获得10
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助阿九采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
ding应助挂科且补考采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
Applied Survey Data Analysis (第三版, 2025) 800
Assessing and Diagnosing Young Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2nd Edition) 700
Images that translate 500
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology 400
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3842227
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3384315
关于积分的说明 10534047
捐赠科研通 3104710
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1709789
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 823323
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 774034