Factors Associated With Parents Asking Other Parents About Firearms in the Home

医学 自杀预防 人为因素与人体工程学 伤害预防 职业安全与健康 毒物控制 医疗急救 病理
作者
Samaa Kemal,Carly G. Menker,Tyler Lennon,Michelle L. Macy,Karen Sheehan,Megan M. Attridge,Audrey Brewer,Marie E. Heffernan
出处
期刊:Pediatrics [American Academy of Pediatrics]
卷期号:154 (6)
标识
DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-068061
摘要

Children living in homes with firearms face an increased risk of injuries.1,2 Approximately 40% of US households with children have a firearm in the home, yet only 44% of these households store firearms locked and unloaded, in the most secure possible manner.3,4 The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends counseling families regarding firearm injury prevention, including asking about firearms in places children visit (eg, playdates).1 The extent to which parents ask about firearms before playdates is unknown. In this study, we sought to determine if Illinois parents had ever asked about the presence of unlocked firearms in the homes their children visit.Data were collected in the fall of 2023 via online surveys administered in English and Spanish by using Qualtrics (Supplemental Information). Eligible respondents were 18 years or older, residing in Illinois, and the parent, stepparent, or guardian (hereafter called "parent") of at least 1 child <18 years old. To assess whether parents had asked other parents about firearms in the home, we asked the following question: "Have you ever asked another parent whether there is an unlocked firearm present in the home before your child had a playdate or went to a friend's home?" (yes/no). If a parent responded "no," they were asked an open-ended follow-up question: "Can you tell us why you haven't asked this?" Parents reported their self-identified age, gender, race and ethnicity, education level, household income, zip code, and children's ages. Given the differential risk of unintentional firearm injury across racial and ethnic groups in the United States,5 we assessed for differences in asking about firearms across these socially defined groups, which may inform targeted public health interventions. We calculated χ2 statistics to examine differences by demographic characteristics. Free-text responses were reviewed and grouped into themes by the study authors. The home institutional review board determined that the study was exempt.Survey responses were received from 1000 Illinois parents (Table 1). Most parents were female (65.5%), non-Hispanic white (59.4%), between 31 and 40 years old (46.9%), and from an urban region (81.6%). Most parents (61.5%) had never asked another parent about the presence of an unlocked firearm in their home. There was a lower likelihood of female parents reporting asking about firearms compared with male parents (33.6% vs 47.6%, P < .001), parents living in rural areas compared with those living in urban areas (25.7% vs 41.4%, P < .001), parents 41 to 50 years old (25.4%) and >50 years old (32.4%) compared with parents 18 to 30 years old (41.5%) and 31 to 40 years old (43.0%, P < .001), parents with a high school degree (34.1%) or some college (31.6%) compared with parents with a college degree (48.8%, P < .001), and parents with a household income of <$30 000 (33.9%) or $30 000 to $124 999 (36.4%) compared with those with a household income of $125 000 or higher (50.8%, P < .001). There were no differences based on parent race and ethnicity or the ages of the children in the home. The top reasons parents had not asked about firearms in the home included (1) never thought about it before (23.5%), (2) child does not attend playdates (21.9%), and (3) did not feel the question was appropriate to ask (9.8%) (Table 2).We found that most sampled Illinois parents did not ask other parents about the presence of unlocked firearms within their homes. Many parents reported they had not asked about firearms because it never occurred to them to do so. This highlights a critical need to raise awareness of this important question. Given that certain groups were found to ask about firearms less, targeted and culturally appropriate messaging through broader, accessible channels (eg, public service announcements, social media) is needed.Among children 0 to 14 years old, almost 20% of unintentional firearm-related deaths occur at a friend's home.6 Therefore, although counseling parents about the secure storage of firearms within their own homes is vital, limiting counseling to this topic may neglect to address a high-risk location for childhood firearm injury. Child health care professionals can model how parents may initiate these conversations with other parents, including by using open communication with direct questions (ie, the presence of a firearm in the home and related storage methods) and approaching the topic in the same way they would other child health and safety topics (eg, supervision, allergies).1,7,8Study limitations include the use of self-reported data, which may be susceptible to recall bias and social desirability bias, potentially leading to the overestimation of respondents asking about firearms. We only assessed whether parents had ever asked about firearms, not the frequency or consistency of this practice. Our sample is from a single state, which may limit generalizability.Child health care professionals should ask parents about the presence of firearms in all homes in which children live and play. The authors of future studies may examine the effectiveness of anticipatory guidance on parental conversations around firearm safety in the homes their children visit.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
4秒前
艾妮吗完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
gtflbk发布了新的文献求助100
5秒前
WZH完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
细心的代天完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
无聊的朋友完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
辛木完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
KKKZ发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
XIXI完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
panisa鹅完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
WILD完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
沉静问芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
小星完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
炎魔之王拉格纳罗斯完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
hahaha完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
JamesPei应助一个西藏采纳,获得10
16秒前
下课闹闹完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
Chuncheng发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
zyyy应助Amber采纳,获得30
18秒前
19秒前
李健应助kelexh采纳,获得10
19秒前
aliderichang发布了新的文献求助20
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
wangzhenghua完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
弄香发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
23秒前
chenchunlan96发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
Qin应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
24秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Peptide Synthesis_Methods and Protocols 400
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5603974
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4688823
关于积分的说明 14856352
捐赠科研通 4695693
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2541066
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1507254
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1471832