医学
骨关节炎
针灸科
科克伦图书馆
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
置信区间
优势比
物理疗法
不利影响
物理医学与康复
外科
内科学
替代医学
病理
作者
Chieh-Jui Lee,Wun-Ting Luo,Ka‐Wai Tam,Tsai‐Wei Huang
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101712
摘要
Acupotomy and acupuncture are both treatments for knee osteoarthritis symptoms. However, acupotomy also has the additional anatomical effect of dissecting inflamed tissue. The problem this study aims to address is whether acupotomy is a better treatment than acupuncture in treating knee osteoarthritis.We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Airiti Library, and Wanfang Data databases from inception to March 2022 for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of acupotomy and acupuncture in patients with knee osteoarthritis.In total, we identified 43 RCTs in this meta-analysis. Compared to the acupuncture group, acupotomy had a higher cure rate (odds ratio (OR) 2.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.36 to 3.65), indicating a better improvement in daily activity function. Acupotomy was also more effective in pain relief and knee score improvement. However, some RCTs indicated that adverse events in the acupotomy group were greater than in the acupuncture group (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.60).Our findings indicated that acupotomy was a more effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis than acupuncture. However, most of the included RCTs had moderate risk of bias, meaning that more high-quality RCTs were needed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI