Contents of US Food and Drug Administration Refuse-to-File Letters for New Drug Applications and Efficacy Supplements and Their Public Disclosure by Applicants

医学 食品药品监督管理局 透明度(行为) 试用登记 药品 家庭医学 医疗急救 药理学 外科 法学 随机对照试验 政治学
作者
Harinder Singh Chahal,Sanjana Mukherjee,Daniel W. Sigelman,Robert Temple
出处
期刊:JAMA Internal Medicine [American Medical Association]
卷期号:181 (4): 522-522
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8866
摘要

Importance

Before reviewing drug applications, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts “filing reviews” to assess whether they are complete enough for full review. If the applications are incomplete, the FDA issues refuse-to-file (RTF) letters identifying deficiencies. The FDA does not make these RTF letters public at the time of issuance. Why the FDA issues RTF letters and how often the letters and their contents are made publicly available are unknown.

Objectives

To quantitatively analyze the FDA’s reasons for issuing RTF letters and assess the public transparency of RTF letters and their contents.

Design and Setting

This cross-sectional study analyzes RTF letters issued in response to new drug applications and efficacy supplements (applications for new indications or patient populations for already approved drugs) submitted to the FDA between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. Statistical analysis was conducted in July 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Two types of information were extracted and cataloged from RTF letters: (1) the reasons why the FDA refused to file applications and (2) the FDA comments that, while not a basis for RTF letters, conveyed important information to applicants. The extent to which applicants publicly disclosed the FDA’s refusal reasons were also assessed.

Results

The study included 103 RTF letters containing a total of 644 identified FDA refusal reasons. Among the 2475 applications that the FDA received during the study time frame, 98 (4.0%) received RTF letters. Overall, 84.5% (544 of 644) of the refusal reasons were for scientific deficiencies; most reasons were related to drug efficacy and safety (196 [30.4%]) and drug quality (125 [19.4%]). The remaining 15.5% of refusal reasons (100 of 644) were for application organization deficiencies or legal issues. A total of 26.2% of the RTF letters (27 of 103) identified presubmission advice from the FDA that applicants did not follow; the most frequently ignored advice was related to clinical trial design (33.3% [9 of 27]), followed by product chemistry and manufacturing (25.9% [7 of 27]). Applicants publicly disclosed the existence of 16 of 103 RTF letters (15.5%); however, only 5.4% of applicant-disclosed reasons (35 of 644) matched the refusal reasons that the FDA had provided in the RTF letters.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study found that the FDA refused to file applications for substantive reasons related to quality, safety, and efficacy, and applicants’ disclosure of those reasons was incomplete. This work sheds light on the FDA’s regulatory decision-making processes and the RTF reasons that could delay availability of therapies to patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Geo_new发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
蜉蝣发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
老北京完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
yan完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
科研者发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
核桃应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
6秒前
子车茗应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
7秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
narcol发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
Owen应助我我我采纳,获得10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
共享精神应助不知名网友采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
yizhimcfu完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
桃子完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
16发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
小盆呐发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
斯文败类应助LCY采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
无极微光应助果冻采纳,获得20
14秒前
淡淡土豆应助蜉蝣采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Predation in the Hymenoptera: An Evolutionary Perspective 1800
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1561
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 1400
Specialist Periodical Reports - Organometallic Chemistry Organometallic Chemistry: Volume 46 1000
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Beyond the sentence: discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5513523
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4607732
关于积分的说明 14506652
捐赠科研通 4543272
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2489491
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1471450
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1443447