医学
椎动脉
动脉剥离
外科
冲程(发动机)
解剖(医学)
放射科
狭窄
支架
病因学
椎动脉剥离术
颈动脉支架置入术
血管内治疗
颈内动脉
动脉瘤
内科学
颈动脉内膜切除术
工程类
机械工程
作者
Martin H. Pham,Rudy J. Rahme,Omar Arnaout,Michael C. Hurley,Richard A. Bernstein,H. Hunt Batjer,Bernard R. Bendok
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2011-01-18
卷期号:68 (4): 856-866
被引量:162
标识
DOI:10.1227/neu.0b013e318209ce03
摘要
Carotid and vertebral artery dissections are a leading cause of stroke in young individuals.To examine the published safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for extracranial artery dissection.We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify all cases of endovascular management of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections.For carotid dissections, our review yielded 31 published reports including 140 patients (153 vessels). Reported etiologies were traumatic (48%, n = 64), spontaneous (37%, n = 49), and iatrogenic (16%, n = 21). The technical success rate of stenting was 99%, and the procedural complication rate was 1.3%. Mean angiographic follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 2-72 months) and revealed in-stent stenosis or occlusion in 2% of patients. Mean clinical follow-up was 17.7 months (range, 1-72 months), and neurological events were seen in 1.4% of patients. For vertebral artery dissections, our review revealed 8 reports including 10 patients (12 vessels). Etiologies were traumatic (60%, n = 6), spontaneous (20%, n = 2), and iatrogenic (20%, n = 2). There was a 100% technical success rate. The mean angiographic follow-up period was 7.5 months (range, 2-12 months). No new neurological events were reported during a mean clinical follow-up period of 26.4 months (range, 3-55 months).Endovascular management of extracranial arterial dissection continues to evolve. Current experience shows that this treatment option is safe and technically feasible. Prospective randomized trials compared with medical management are needed to further elucidate the role of stenting.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI