医学
前列腺癌
前列腺
组织病理学
活检
优势比
上皮内瘤变
磁共振成像
前列腺特异性抗原
泌尿科
多参数磁共振成像
放射科
癌症
内科学
病理
作者
Vasilis Stavrinides,Joseph M. Norris,Solon Karapanagiotis,Francesco Giganti,Alistair Grey,Nicholas Trahearn,Alex Freeman,Aiman Haider,Lina Carmona,Simon Bott,Louise Brown,Nick Burns‐Cox,Tim Dudderidge,Ahmed El‐Shater Bosaily,Maneesh Ghei,Alastair Henderson,Richard Hindley,Richard Kaplan,Robert Oldroyd,Chris Parker,Raj Persad,Derek J. Rosario,Iqbal Shergill,Mathias Winkler,Alex Kirkham,Shonit Punwani,Hayley C. Whitaker,Hashim U. Ahmed,Mark Emberton
出处
期刊:Radiology
[Radiological Society of North America]
日期:2023-04-01
卷期号:307 (1)
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.220762
摘要
Background The effects of regional histopathologic changes on prostate MRI scans have not been accurately quantified in men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and no previous biopsy. Purpose To assess how Gleason grade, maximum cancer core length (MCCL), inflammation, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), or atypical small acinar proliferation within a Barzell zone affects the odds of MRI visibility. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of the Prostate MRI Imaging Study (PROMIS; May 2012 to November 2015), consecutive participants who underwent multiparametric MRI followed by a combined biopsy, including 5-mm transperineal mapping (TPM), were evaluated. TPM pathologic findings were reported at the whole-prostate level and for each of 20 Barzell zones per prostate. An expert panel blinded to the pathologic findings reviewed MRI scans and declared which Barzell areas spanned Likert score 3–5 lesions. The relationship of Gleason grade and MCCL to zonal MRI outcome (visible vs nonvisible) was assessed using generalized linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for individual participants. Inflammation, PIN, and atypical small acinar proliferation were similarly assessed in men who had negative TPM results. Results Overall, 161 men (median age, 62 years [IQR, 11 years]) were evaluated and 3179 Barzell zones were assigned MRI status. Compared with benign areas, the odds of MRI visibility were higher when a zone contained cancer with a Gleason score of 3+4 (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% CI: 1.9, 4.9; P < .001) or Gleason score greater than or equal to 4+3 (OR, 8.7; 95% CI: 4.5, 17.0; P < .001). MCCL also determined visibility (OR, 1.24 per millimeter increase; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.33; P < .001), but odds were lower with each prostate volume doubling (OR, 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.9). In men who were TPM-negative, the presence of PIN increased the odds of zonal visibility (OR, 3.7; 95% CI: 1.5, 9.1; P = .004). Conclusion An incremental relationship between cancer burden and prostate MRI visibility was observed. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia contributed to false-positive MRI findings. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01292291 © RSNA, 2022 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Harmath in this issue.