Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Ava应助己凡采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
CodeCraft应助Zyzpkilly采纳,获得80
2秒前
长孙巧凡完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
魁梧的海秋应助团团采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
David发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Zyzpkilly完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
微笑书白发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
二师兄发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
怕黑妙之完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
仙人殊恍惚应助小丘2024采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
Niuma发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
怕黑妙之发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
XYF完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
15秒前
现代发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
lucky发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
没有昵称发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
章半仙发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
平淡思雁完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
dylan发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
sheneason发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
25秒前
Mrwang完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
荆扉完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
chaiyuying发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
小新完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
dlCao完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
两会发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
英俊的铭应助小花采纳,获得10
31秒前
fengfeng发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
科研通AI2S应助莲书采纳,获得10
32秒前
卡库尔完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
歯科矯正学 第7版(或第5版) 1004
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 1000
Semiconductor Process Reliability in Practice 1000
Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential (第二版) 1000
Security Awareness: Applying Practical Cybersecurity in Your World 6th Edition 800
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3241376
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2885829
关于积分的说明 8240787
捐赠科研通 2554366
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1382498
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 649586
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 625248