Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
小羊给银鱼在游的求助进行了留言
刚刚
自觉梦旋完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
1秒前
古月方源发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
向北要上岸应助ying采纳,获得10
2秒前
向北要上岸应助power采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
5秒前
Khalil完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
腼腆的绝山完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
ZLHS发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
hzs关闭了hzs文献求助
8秒前
8秒前
在水一方应助听话的梦岚采纳,获得20
8秒前
linyudie完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
舒心的雍发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Akim应助蓝天采纳,获得10
10秒前
sunshine完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
Anan发布了新的文献求助50
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高高的山兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
xiao发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
王靖超发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
苯巴比妥完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
领导范儿应助夏日阳光采纳,获得50
13秒前
13秒前
记忆超群完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
神勇尔阳关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
小周长大开飞船完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
jw完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
LONGLONG发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
liucheng发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
AnnualResearch andConsultation Report of Panorama survey and Investment strategy onChinaIndustry 1000
機能性マイクロ細孔・マイクロ流体デバイスを利用した放射性核種の 分離・溶解・凝集挙動に関する研究 1000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 1000
Engineering for calcareous sediments : proceedings of the International Conference on Calcareous Sediments, Perth 15-18 March 1988 / edited by R.J. Jewell, D.C. Andrews 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Harnessing Lymphocyte-Cytokine Networks to Disrupt Current Paradigms in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome Management: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6259362
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8081507
关于积分的说明 16885192
捐赠科研通 5331222
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2837941
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1815319
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1669241