Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
今后应助标致秋尽采纳,获得10
刚刚
靓丽衫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
sxy发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
英勇雁开完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zym完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
科研通AI6.3应助One采纳,获得30
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
形弃影发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
ruochenzu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
7秒前
Niko发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
科目三应助小白采纳,获得10
8秒前
云飞扬发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
深情安青应助善良的尔阳采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
浔初先生完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
神宝嘎li应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
10秒前
10秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
崔小乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
英俊的铭应助小小小先生采纳,获得10
10秒前
马马发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook Sixth Edition 2000
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Continuing Syntax 1000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Work • Third edition • 2025 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Pharma R&D Annual Review 2026 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6214268
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8039778
关于积分的说明 16754456
捐赠科研通 5302534
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2825058
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1803382
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1663969