已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
窝头完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
威武灵阳完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
超人研究生完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
Vinny发布了新的文献求助100
5秒前
自己的样子好好看完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
学术大拿发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
正直乘云完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
前方完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
妮露的修狗完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
小二郎应助cjl采纳,获得10
12秒前
大方的不愁完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
SciGPT应助学术大拿采纳,获得10
15秒前
zhenzhen完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
allia完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
老实的电源完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
新新完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
22秒前
新新发布了新的文献求助20
23秒前
dkswy完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
酷波er应助qq采纳,获得10
24秒前
所所应助zhenzhen采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
smh完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
aaa完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
斯文无敌完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
fx完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
英姑应助chuzihang采纳,获得10
30秒前
31秒前
31秒前
31秒前
景承完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
淡定的以寒完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
脑电大模型与情感脑机接口研究--郑伟龙 500
GMP in Practice: Regulatory Expectations for the Pharmaceutical Industry 500
简明药物化学习题答案 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6298912
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8115904
关于积分的说明 16990588
捐赠科研通 5360169
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2847581
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1825035
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1679340