Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
李健应助遇见馅儿饼采纳,获得10
1秒前
Ya_Yen发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
十一完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
故意的语海完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
芽芽配茄子完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xwm完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xern完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zxp完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
难过的豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
LLL完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
蓦然完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
wanci应助十八采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
愉快发带发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
FashionBoy应助柯燕婷采纳,获得10
5秒前
board_Gu完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
自然的平蓝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
浊轶完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
小尘埃完成签到,获得积分0
6秒前
paleo-地质完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
云淡风轻完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zhangchen123发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
公西傲蕾完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Frankie完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
冬月完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
专一的白萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
shaishai发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Orange应助sunny采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
skyangar完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
LIN2QI完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
sunrain完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
ChatGPT发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 1500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
CLSI M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 36th edition 400
Cancer Targets: Novel Therapies and Emerging Research Directions (Part 1) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6362341
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8176125
关于积分的说明 17225514
捐赠科研通 5417064
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2866702
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1843844
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1691625