Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 评定量表 数学 政治学 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
AAA1798发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
wanci应助难过千易采纳,获得10
1秒前
刘光正完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
善学以致用应助gxmu6322采纳,获得10
3秒前
漫步云端发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
CartGo发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Ava应助AJJACKY采纳,获得10
4秒前
老迟到的沛萍关注了科研通微信公众号
5秒前
5秒前
无色热带鱼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
打打应助可乐不可口采纳,获得10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
端庄的正豪完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
田様应助Tsui采纳,获得10
9秒前
王杰完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
好运连连完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
可乐不可口完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
半糖发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
sunny完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
盛清让发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
饱满南松发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
InaZheng发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
科目三应助SamYang采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
CartGo完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
快乐小狗完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3975378
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3519775
关于积分的说明 11199621
捐赠科研通 3256067
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798124
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877386
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806305