Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
狸子发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
upup完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
充电宝应助wxtlzzdp采纳,获得10
1秒前
朴素的怜雪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
chaowa完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
刘晓倩完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
皮代谷完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
geng57完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
徐徐618完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
丘比特应助boxi采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助菠菜采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
iwhisper发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
zyx发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
木石前盟发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
口恩完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
一一完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
万能图书馆应助北梦采纳,获得10
5秒前
iwhisper发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
一一发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
在水一方应助阳yang采纳,获得10
7秒前
荒野风发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
不安的秋白完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
seven应助OK采纳,获得50
8秒前
功不唐捐发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
李爱国应助小巧幼蓉采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
Medical Management of Pregnancy Complicated by Diabetes 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6056634
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7889456
关于积分的说明 16291329
捐赠科研通 5201966
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2783368
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1766099
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1646904