Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
朱朱完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
yunzhetang完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
夜雾格发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
花露水完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
牛帮帮发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
熙熙攘攘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
JamesPei应助吹什么风采纳,获得10
3秒前
Zhu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
shann完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
CodeCraft应助一行琉璃采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
码头完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
HUYAOWEI发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
传奇3应助超帅听枫采纳,获得10
12秒前
田様应助luren采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
码头关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
14秒前
Phalaenopsis完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
wan完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
墨明棋妙发布了新的文献求助20
17秒前
18秒前
赘婿应助fff采纳,获得10
19秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助111采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
伶俐问薇完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
一对月亮发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Proudmoore发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
爆米花应助自然的代灵采纳,获得10
20秒前
在荔栀阿完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery and Development, Volumes 1 - 8, 8 Volume Set, 8th Edition 1800
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (3rd Edition) 1000
International Arbitration Law and Practice 1000
文献PREDICTION EQUATIONS FOR SHIPS' TURNING CIRCLES或期刊Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders第95卷 1000
BRITTLE FRACTURE IN WELDED SHIPS 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 细胞生物学 基因 电极 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6156365
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7984855
关于积分的说明 16593448
捐赠科研通 5266373
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2810049
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1790280
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1657587