Dispensing error rates in pharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 奇纳 梅德林 药店 等级间信度 急诊医学 内科学 家庭医学 统计 心理干预 精神科 政治学 数学 评定量表 法学
作者
Irene S. Um,Alexander J. Clough,Edwin C.K. Tan
出处
期刊:Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (1): 1-9 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.003
摘要

Dispensing errors can cause preventable patient harm such as adverse drug events, hospitalisation, or death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and quantify the global prevalence of dispensing errors across pharmacy settings. Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched between January 2010 and September 2023. Studies published in English, from all pharmacy settings, with data that could be used to calculate the prevalence of dispensing errors were included. Studies were excluded if they did not report true dispensing errors. Data including study characteristics and dispensing error characteristics were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using 10 criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled prevalences and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed according to sample size, study design, setting, error identification method, location, and study quality. PROSPERO: CRD42020197860. Of the 4216 articles, 62 studies were included. Hospital was the most common pharmacy setting (n = 44, 71.0%) and 15 studies were based in the community. The type of denominator used to report dispensing errors varied between studies, such as dispensed items (n = 45, 72.6%), doses (n = 7, 11.3%), or patients (n = 5, 8.1%). The prevalence of dispensing errors ranged from 0 to 33.3% (n = 62 studies with 64 prevalence estimates). The pooled prevalence for dispensing errors across all studies was 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%–2.1%, I2 = 100%). A majority of studies were of moderate methodological quality (n = 36, 58.1%) and interrater reliability was applied in eight studies. The worldwide prevalence of dispensing errors was 1.6% across community, hospital and other pharmacy settings. This varied depending on the type of denominator used, study design and how the error was identified. This review highlights the need for consistent definitions and standardised classifications of dispensing errors worldwide to reduce heterogeneity.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
研友_ZGjo4n发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
852应助虾乐采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
薛长琴完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
zwx发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
李亚宁发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
心灵美映之完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
sherrywuxh发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
孙元发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
KKKK完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
zas发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
慕青应助彭彭采纳,获得10
7秒前
大溺发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
领导范儿应助zwx采纳,获得10
8秒前
Popeye发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
lalala发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小王发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
瘦瘦不斜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
酸萝卜完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
传奇3应助糖油果子采纳,获得10
13秒前
爆米花应助溯7采纳,获得10
14秒前
mxnklimt发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
默存完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助小王采纳,获得10
19秒前
Rab_b1t发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
AFF完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
周财全完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
lin发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Applied Min-Max Approach to Missile Guidance and Control 5000
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 1000
Anionic polymerization of acenaphthylene: identification of impurity species formed as by-products 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6324992
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8141154
关于积分的说明 17068892
捐赠科研通 5377717
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2853939
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1831665
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1682747