Comparison of Stem Cell Transplantation Using Unrelated, Haploidentical, and Sibling Donors for Patients with Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

The preferred donor (haploidentical donor [HID] versus matched unrelated donor [URD]) choice in patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who lack an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) and fail upfront immunosuppressive treatment (IST) therapy is unknown. We retrospectively investigated SAA patients (n = 58) who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) between January 2012 and October 2022. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) were comparable among the URD (n = 8), HID (n = 25), and MSD (n = 25) cohorts (OS: mean, 87.5 ± 11.7% versus 98.0 ± 6.5% versus 83.3 ± 7.6% [P = .926]; FFS: mean, 60.0 ± 18.2% versus 87.0 ± 7.0% versus 78.3 ± 8.6% [P = .222]). Multivariate analysis revealed that primary engraftment failure independently predicted OS and secondary graft failure predicted FFS among SAA patients who underwent allo-SCT, but donor type and age were not predictive of these outcomes. An urgent second SCT for patients with engraftment failure may be an effective salvage treatment. Our findings show that an alternative donor SCT is indicated for eligible SAA patients without an MSD even if age ≥40 years.