The assimilated secret: Understanding as silence in Japanese LGBT discourse

隐身 社会学 沉默 主流 人类性学 政治 反问句 同情 性别研究 美学 政治学 法学 语言学 哲学 物理 光学
作者
Anya Doi-Benson
出处
期刊:The communication review [Informa]
卷期号:27 (1): 78-106
标识
DOI:10.1080/10714421.2023.2254171
摘要

ABSTRACTAs discussion of LGBT issues has become mainstream in Japanese society and politics, numerous didactic media materials aim to cultivate public “understanding” of LGBT. But what precise understanding is sought? Through analysis of four books released in 2021, this article examines a recurring rhetorical strategy in which calls for acceptance define “LGBT” through invisibility and unknowability. LGBT individuals are depicted as primarily desiring the maintenance of nonrecognition, thus requiring the advocacy of tolerance-building media publications. Advocacy for (and often through) anonymity is replicated in the works’ content, which minimizes depictions of romance or sexuality. Invisibility is further prioritized by repeated warnings against outing others, described in language broad and sensational enough to cast all discussion of non-normative sexual/gender identities in a threatening light. The definitional status afforded to unknowability frames “understanding LGBT” as the acknowledgment of perpetually hidden minorities within Japanese society. By deploying this political ethic in transmedia tolerance-building content, consumption is promoted as the only method by which to interact with a fundamentally unreachable Other. As content creators promise to reveal secrets – only to exhort even stricter secrecy – the LGBT subject is constructed through the allure of mystery.KEYWORDS: DiversityJapanese mediaLGBT politicsoutingqueer pedagogy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 The usage of “rikai” and similar terms such as “shiru” and “wakaru” in these works’ discussion of LGBT often more closely echo the term “awareness” in English. I use “understanding” in this article because “rikai” also bears connotations of sympathy and compassion, which may inform the way that the term is applied.2 This article uses the term “LGBT” instead of “LGBTQ,” “LGBTQ+” or another combination because “LGBT” is the most common formulation found in Japanese political discourse at the time of writing. The term “LGBTQ+” is used when referring to sources that prefer it.3 All primary sources used in this article were originally published in Japanese, and all translations are my own.4 The same survey found that newspapers and TV enjoy the highest levels of public trust (61.2% and 53.8%, respectively; Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Citation2021, p. 219). In conducting this research, numerous newspaper and TV sources were surveyed, most of which followed the same patterns discussed in this essay (and often referenced the same individuals). The abbreviated and/or specialized content of the newspaper and TV formats, however, left no individual article or program assuming the role of generalized “introduction” to LGBT issues.5 Kunitachi City’s webpage on sexual/gender diversity is an exception to this, as it uses the phrase “against the intent of the person involved” (“honnin no ishi ni hanshite;” Kunitachi City, Citation2022), leaving more allowance for publicly out identities. Nevertheless, that same webpage links to workplace guidelines for the city, which describe outing using the phrase “without obtaining acknowledgment from the person involved” (“honnin no ryōshō o ezu ni”), again suggesting the need for positive consent (Kunitachi City, Citation2021, p. 9).6 A 2019 Dentsu survey found that 65.1% of LGBT people in Japan were not out to anyone (Yoshimoto, Citation2019). Similarly, a 2020 government-sponsored survey on LGBT work environments found that only 7.3% of lesbian, gay or bisexual respondents and 15.8% of transgender respondents had come out to even one person at their workplace (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Citation2020, p. 234).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
它山凡溪寺完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
小蘑菇应助学术蝗虫采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
香蕉觅云应助西西采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
所所应助苹果蜗牛采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
十月发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
周凡淇发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
安代桃完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
刘亚博发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
慕青应助11采纳,获得10
7秒前
穆紫应助hao采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
凉介完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
朴素羊发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Xwu关闭了Xwu文献求助
10秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
ssdddq完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Hou发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
YY完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Q123ba叭完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
JamesPei应助无辜忆寒采纳,获得10
15秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
pcr163应助CL采纳,获得100
17秒前
ljr完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
机智秋莲发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
爆米花应助sxw2088采纳,获得10
19秒前
科研通AI2S应助苹果蜗牛采纳,获得10
21秒前
Myronhaoyuan完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
Alexwww发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
木子发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
24秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3124857
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2775196
关于积分的说明 7725657
捐赠科研通 2430668
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1291358
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 622123
版权声明 600328