医学
丁丙诺啡
羟考酮
美沙酮
类阿片
随机对照试验
癌症疼痛
背景(考古学)
焦虑
慢性疼痛
芬太尼
止痛药
物理疗法
麻醉
内科学
癌症
精神科
受体
古生物学
生物
作者
Maike Imkamp,Maurice Theunissen,Sander M. J. van Kuijk,Johan Haumann,Oscar Corli,Cristina Bosetti,Wojciech Leppert,Cinzia Brunelli,Ernesto Zecca,M.H.J. van den Beuken-van Everdingen
摘要
Abstract Context There is no consensus on which “strong” (or step 3 WHO analgesic ladder) opioid to prescribe to a particular patient with cancer‐related pain. A better understanding of opioid and patient characteristics on treatment response will contribute to a more personalized opioid treatment. Objectives Assessment of potential predictors for successful opioid treatment response in patients with cancer pain. Methods An international partnership between four cancer pain research groups resulted in a combined individual‐level database from four relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n = 881). Together, these RCTs investigated the short‐term (1 week) and medium‐term (4 or 5 weeks) treatment responses for morphine, buprenorphine, methadone, oxycodone, and fentanyl. Candidate predictors for treatment response were sex, age, pain type, pain duration, depression, anxiety, Karnofsky performance score, opioid type, and use of anti‐neuropathic drug. Results Opioid type and pain type were found statistically significant predictors of short‐term treatment success. Sex, age, pain type, anxiety, and opioid type were statistically, significantly associated with medium‐term treatment success. However, these models showed low discriminative power. Conclusion Fentanyl and methadone, and mixed pain were found to be statistically significant predictors of treatment success in patients with cancer‐related pain. With the predictors currently assessed our data did not allow for the creation of a clinical prediction model with good discriminative power. Additional – unrevealed – predictors are necessary to develop a future prediction model.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI