Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement

透明度(行为) 系统回顾 循证实践 循证医学 最佳实践 医疗保健 医学 管理科学 业务 政治学 梅德林 工程类 替代医学 病理 法学
作者
Andrea C. Tricco,Hanan Khalil,Cheryl Holly,Garumma Tolu Feyissa,Christina Godfrey,Catrin Evans,Diane Sawchuck,Morankar Sudhakar,Constantine Asahngwa,Daphne Stannard,Misra Abdulahi,Laura Bonnano,Edoardo Aromataris,Patricia McInerney,Rosemary Wilson,Dong Pang,Zhiwen Wang,Ana Filipa Cardoso,Micah D.J. Peters,Casey Marnie,Timothy Hugh Barker,Danielle Pollock,Alexa McArthur,Zachary Munn
出处
期刊:JBI evidence synthesis [Joanna Briggs Institute]
卷期号:20 (4): 944-949 被引量:36
标识
DOI:10.11124/jbies-21-00371
摘要

The demand for rapid reviews has exploded in recent years. A rapid review is an approach to evidence synthesis that provides timely information to decision-makers (eg, health care planners, providers, policymakers, patients) by simplifying the evidence synthesis process. A rapid review is particularly appealing for urgent decisions. JBI is a world-renowned international collaboration for evidence synthesis and implementation methodologies. The principles for JBI evidence synthesis include comprehensiveness, rigor, transparency, and a focus on applicability to clinical practice. As such, JBI has not yet endorsed a specific approach for rapid reviews. In this paper, we compare rapid reviews versus other types of evidence synthesis, provide a range of rapid evidence products, outline how to appraise the quality of rapid reviews, and present the JBI position on rapid reviews. JBI Collaborating Centers conduct rapid reviews for decision-makers in specific circumstances, such as limited time or funding constraints. A standardized approach is not used for these cases;instead, the evidence synthesis methods are tailored to the needs of the decision-maker. The urgent need to deliver timely evidence to decision-makers poses challenges to JBI's mission to produce high-quality, trustworthy evidence. However, JBI recognizes the value of rapid reviews as part of the evidence synthesis ecosystem. As such, it is recommended that rapid reviews be conducted with the same methodological rigor and transparency expected of JBI reviews. Most importantly, transparency is essential, and the rapid review should clearly report where any simplification in the steps of the evidence synthesis process has been taken.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cj完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
犹豫寒云完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
小舒完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
淡淡友瑶完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
wjx完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
ccccc1998关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
林木森完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
万能图书馆应助nini采纳,获得10
4秒前
呆萌背包完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
大聪明完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Alger完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
yaocx完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
邓佳鑫Alan应助paul采纳,获得10
6秒前
斯文败类应助三木采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
zzp完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
JamesPei应助小飞采纳,获得10
7秒前
大方的涟妖完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
DD完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
ljy完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Jey完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
TIMF14发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
打打应助summer采纳,获得10
10秒前
Orange应助ykaaa采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
自由的沛山完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
ddr发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
无花果应助袁思宇采纳,获得10
12秒前
瞿敏敏发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
完美世界应助strait采纳,获得10
12秒前
酷波er应助Boston采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 2000
The Lali Section: An Excellent Reference Section for Upper - Devonian in South China 1500
Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential (第二版) 1000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 850
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3249276
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2892624
关于积分的说明 8272826
捐赠科研通 2560904
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1389300
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 651144
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 627946