The Bobath (NDT) concept in adult neurological rehabilitation: what is the state of the knowledge? A scoping review. Part II: intervention studies perspectives

忠诚 干预(咨询) 观察研究 康复 随机对照试验 心理干预 包裹体(矿物) 心理学 系统回顾 临床研究设计 人口 应用心理学 研究设计 医学 物理疗法 物理医学与康复 梅德林 临床试验 计算机科学 护理部 社会心理学 病理 社会学 电信 外科 法学 社会科学 政治学 环境卫生
作者
Julie Vaughan-Graham,Cheryl Cott,Virginia Wright
出处
期刊:Disability and Rehabilitation [Informa]
卷期号:37 (21): 1909-1928 被引量:44
标识
DOI:10.3109/09638288.2014.987880
摘要

Objective: The study’s purpose was to describe the range of knowledge pertaining to the Bobath (NDT) concept in adult neurological rehabilitation, synthesizes the findings, identify knowledge gaps and develop empirically based recommendations for future research. Methods: A scoping review of research and non-research articles published from 2007 to 2012. Two independent reviewers selected studies based on a systematic procedure. Inclusion criteria for studies were electronically accessible English language literature with Bobath and/or Neurodevelopmental Therapy as the subject heading in the title/keyword/abstract/intervention comparison with respect to adult neurological conditions. Data were abstracted and summarized with respect to study design, theoretical framework, clinical application including population representation, study fidelity, intervention comparison, duration of care, measurement and findings. Results: Of the 33 publications identified 17 were intervention studies (11 RCT’s/1 prospective parallel group design/5 N-of-1). One other paper was a systematic review. Conclusions: The intervention studies, primarily RCT designs, have serious methodological concerns particularly related to study/treatment fidelity and measurement resulting in no clear clinical direction. Aspects such as theoretical framework, therapist skill, quality of movement measurement and individualized interventions require careful consideration in the design of Bobath studies.Implications for RehabilitationFuture intervention studies should be based on the current Bobath theoretical framework and key aspects of clinical practice.Study and treatment fidelity issues need to be carefully considered when interpreting the results of existing RCT’s evaluating the Bobath concept.N-of-1 randomized, observational, factorial and mixed method study designs should be considered as alternative study options.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小马甲应助勤恳的嚓茶采纳,获得10
刚刚
aizhujun完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
dd关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
syiimo完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
温柔的安梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
今今完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
在水一方应助炙热的便当采纳,获得10
3秒前
踏实碧琴发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
平常念双关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
orixero应助Elfin98采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研小牛马采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
Rwmqwq发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
henrychan发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
10秒前
篇篇高分完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
麦益颖发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
又声完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
小晶豆发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
ttong完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科研小白发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
所所应助背后如之采纳,获得10
17秒前
情怀应助superming采纳,获得10
17秒前
充电宝应助渔舟漫星河采纳,获得100
17秒前
Iloveyou发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
狂野大象发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
14完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
HS发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
小烟囱完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Slimmer完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
Handbook of Fuel Cells, 6 Volume Set 1666
Floxuridine; Third Edition 1000
Tracking and Data Fusion: A Handbook of Algorithms 1000
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 800
消化器内視鏡関連の偶発症に関する第7回全国調査報告2019〜2021年までの3年間 500
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 500
Framing China: Media Images and Political Debates in Britain, the USA and Switzerland, 1900-1950 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 内科学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 冶金 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2861490
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2466871
关于积分的说明 6688461
捐赠科研通 2158099
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1146415
版权声明 585109
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 563292