狼牙棒
再狭窄
新生内膜
医学
支架
内科学
心脏病学
光学相干层析成像
病变
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
靶病变
冠状动脉再狭窄
血管成形术
放射科
外科
心肌梗塞
作者
Erion Xhepa,Jola Bresha,Michael Joner,Alexander Hapfelmeier,Fernando Rivero,Gjin Ndrepepa,Nejva Nano,Javier Cuesta,Sebastian Kufner,Salvatore Cassese,Teresa Bastante,Alp Aytekin,Andi Rroku,Marcos García-Guimarães,Anna Lena Lahmann,Susanne Pinieck,Himanshu Rai,Massimiliano Fusaro,Heribert Schunkert,Marı́a José Pérez-Vizcayno,Nieves Gonzalo,Fernándo Alfonso,Adnan Kastrati
出处
期刊:Eurointervention
[Europa Digital and Publishing]
日期:2021-08-01
卷期号:17 (5): e388-e395
被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.4244/eij-d-20-00662
摘要
Drug-coated balloons (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) represent the currently recommended treatments for in-stent restenosis (ISR). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows detailed neointimal characterisation which can guide treatment strategies.The aims of this study were first, to assess the relation between neointimal pattern and clinical outcomes following in-stent restenosis (ISR) treatment, and second, to explore a potential interaction between neointimal pattern and treatment modality relative to clinical outcomes.Patients undergoing OCT-guided treatment (DCB or DES) of ISR in three European centres were included. Based on the median of distribution of non-homogeneous neointima quadrants, patients were categorised into low and high inhomogeneity groups.A total of 197 patients (low inhomogeneity=100 and high inhomogeneity=97) were included. There were no significant differences in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (p=0.939) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR) (p=0.732) between the two groups. The exploratory analysis showed a significant interaction between neointimal pattern and treatment modality regarding MACE (pint=0.006) and TLR (pint=0.022). DES showed a significant advantage over DCB in the high (MACE: HR 0.26 [0.10-0.65], p=0.004; TLR: HR 0.28 [0.11-0.69], p=0.006), but not in the low inhomogeneity group (MACE: p=0.917; TLR: p=0.797).In patients with ISR treated with DCB or DES, there were no significant differences in terms of MACE or TLR between the low and high inhomogeneity groups. A significant interaction was observed between treatment modality and neointimal pattern with an advantage of DES over DCB in the high and no difference in the low inhomogeneity group. This warrants confirmation from prospective dedicated studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI