Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation

BACKGROUND Gallbladder perforation occurs in 2% to 11% of patients with acute cholecystitis, with associated mortality estimated to be at 12% to 42%. Because of its low incidence, the data on management remain sparse. There is a lack of evidence to suggest whether early or delayed cholecystectomy is superior in the treatment of perforated cholecystitis. We hypothesize that an early definitive operation is associated with decreased total hospital length of stay (THLOS). METHODS Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from the American College of Surgery, we identified patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation on an urgent or emergent basis from 2012 to 2021. We divided them into those who underwent early (<2 days from the date of admission to the date of operation) and delayed cholecystectomy (≥2 days from the date of admission to the date of operation). Our primary outcome was the THLOS. We created multivariate regression models to assess for the association of early versus delayed operation and THLOS. RESULTS The THLOS was found to be 2.94 days longer in the delayed group compared with the early group ( p < 0.05). In those who did not present with sepsis on admission, the THLOS was noted to be 4.71 days longer in the delayed group compared with the early group ( p < 0.05). Early versus delayed operation was not associated with a difference in the postoperative length of stay, 30-day postoperative complications, rate of readmission, and reoperation, regardless of preoperative sepsis status. CONCLUSION Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder perforation is associated with decreased THLOS, and there were no other differences in outcomes compared with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients with gallbladder perforation would likely benefit from an early operation within 2 days of admission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care management; Level III.