Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties, bioequivalence, safety and tolerability of the first domestic semaglutide

赛马鲁肽 生物等效性 耐受性 医学 药理学 不利影响 药代动力学 内分泌学 糖尿病 2型糖尿病 利拉鲁肽
作者
Ametov As,И. Е. Шохин,E. A. Rogozhina,T. G. Bodrova,M. E. Nevretdinova,P. A. Bely,K. Ya. Zaslavskaya,V. S. Scherbakova,Д. В. Куркин,K. N. Koryanova,E. S. Mishchenko,E. Yu. Kesova,E. D. Kozlov,E. S. Samoshkina,Д. Н. Андреев,Yu. G. Kazaishvili,S. M. Noskov,Л. А. Балыкова
出处
期刊:Farmaciâ i Farmakologiâ (Pâtigorsk) [Volgograd State Medical University]
卷期号:11 (4): 324-346
标识
DOI:10.19163/2307-9266-2023-11-4-324-346
摘要

Semaglutide is a representative of analogues of the incretin hormone human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and is currently used in Russia for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; in monotherapy and in combination therapy), including patients with obesity and overweight. The aim of the work was to conduct a comparative assessment of the physicochemical properties, a biological activity, bioequivalence and safety, including tolerability and immunogenicity, of the drug Quincent® (semaglutide, 1.34 mg/ml, a solution for a subcutaneous administration, Promomed Rus LLC, Russia) and the drug Ozempic® (semaglutide, 1.34 mg/ml, a solution for a subcutaneous administration, Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark) when administered to healthy volunteers. Materials and methods. To assess the degree of similarity of the study drug Quincenta® (semaglutide, 1.34 mg/ml, a solution for a subcutaneous administration, Promomed Rus LLC, Russia) with a chemically synthesized active substance to the original (reference) drug Ozempic® (semaglutide, 1.34 mg/ml, a solution for a subcutaneous administration, Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark), a comparative study of physicochemical properties and a biological activity was carried out. To assess the bioequivalence of the study drug and the reference drug, an open randomized parallel comparative study with the participation of healthy volunteers ( n =54), 54 participants of which had been included in the population, was conducted. The volunteers were randomized into 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio, and received a single dose subcutaneously either of the study drug (domestic semaglutide at a dose of 0.5 mg) or the reference drug (foreign semaglutide at a dose of 0.5 mg). The mode of administration was in the morning on an empty stomach. A semaglutide concentration was determined in serum samples using a previously validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. A quantitative determination of antibodies to semaglutide in the human serum by ELISA was carried out with a microplate photometer using ready-made kits pre-validated by the manufacturer. The conclusion about the bioequivalence of the compared drugs was made using an approach based on the assessment of 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the geometric mean values of the parameters C max , AUC (0–t) of semaglutide in the measurement original units. Results. The results of the comparative analysis of the study drug and the reference drug demonstrate the comparability of their physicochemical properties and biological activity. The results of the clinical study demonstrated the bioequivalence of the test drug and the reference drug. Thus, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs were comparable to each other: the C max value for the study drug was 42.088±8.827 ng/ml, for the reference drug Ozempic® it was 42.2556±7.84. Herewith, the half-life for the study drug and the reference drug was 168.39±39.47 and 157.99±28.57 hours, respectively. The resulting 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of the C max and AUC 0–t values of the study drug and the reference drug were 90.89–109.15 and 91.66–111.27%, respectively. The tolerability of the drugs in the volunteers was notified as good. No adverse events were recorded during the study. No serious adverse events were reported throughout the study. According to the results of the immunogenicity analysis, no antibodies to Russian-made semaglutide were detected in the blood serum of the volunteers, which indicated the lack of Results. The results of a comparative analysis of the study drug and the reference drug demonstrate the comparability of physicochemical properties and biological activity. The results of the clinical study demonstrated the bioequivalence of the study drug and the reference drug. Thus, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs were comparable to each other: the C max value for the study drug was 42.088±8.827 ng/ml, for the reference drug Ozempic® this figure was 42.2556±7.84. At the same time, the half-life for the study drug and the reference drug was 168.39±39.47 and 157.99±28.57 hours, respectively. The resulting 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of the C max and AUC 0–t values of the study drug and the reference drug were 90.89–109.15 and 91.66–111.27%, respectively. Tolerability of the drugs in volunteers was noted as good. No adverse events were recorded during the study. No serious adverse events were reported throughout the study. According to the results of the immunogenicity analysis, no antibodies to Russian-made semaglutide were detected in the blood serum of the volunteers, which indicated the lack of the drug immunogenicity. Conclusion. In the course of the study, the comparability of the physicochemical properties and biological activity of the studied Russian drug with the chemically synthesized active substance Quincenta® to the reference drug Ozempic® was confirmed: the activity range of the studied drugs was within 80–120% in relation to the standard sample of semaglutide. The bioequivalence and a similar safety profile, including the immunogenicity and tolerability of the Russian drug Quincenta® (semaglutide 1.34 mg/ml, Promomed Rus LLC, Russia) were shown in comparison with the foreign drug Ozempic® (semaglutide 1.34 mg/ml, Novo Nordisk A/C, Denmark).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Ext发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
yyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
万能图书馆应助释怀采纳,获得10
1秒前
jzj发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
13333完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
linshaoyu完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
长情半邪发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
sxqt完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
茶卡应助小龙采纳,获得10
5秒前
蓝雁发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Ext完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
fu完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
宇文无施发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研通AI6.2应助冷静幻翠采纳,获得10
5秒前
桐桐应助姜姜采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研通AI6.2应助研友_ngJQzL采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
陈隆发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
LSH970829发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
Orange应助dannnnn采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.1应助limanglu采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
engine应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
ly应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
engine应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
Rita应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
ly应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 2000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 700
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 600
Zeolites: From Fundamentals to Emerging Applications 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5955238
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7165701
关于积分的说明 15937623
捐赠科研通 5090084
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2735520
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1696354
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1617271