Training Intensity Needed for Volume Linearity and Syringe DLCO Check Quality Control

医学 注射器 线性 质量(理念) 强度(物理) 体积热力学 量子力学 认识论 精神科 物理 哲学
作者
Ellen A Becker,E Morán,Jason Blonshine,V. Rodríguez,Susan Blonshine
出处
期刊:Respiratory Care [American Association for Respiratory Care]
标识
DOI:10.1089/respcare.12565
摘要

Background: Technologists must assure the accuracy and precision of pulmonary function equipment prior to testing patients. This study aimed to identify the sources of failure and unacceptable submission rates for spirometry volume linearity and syringe diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) check quality control (QC). In addition, we explored whether the time between training and first QC submission affected overall percentage of unacceptable submissions. Methods: Participants in a cross-sectional global study submitted QC for evaluation from October 2014 to May 2018 from 114 laboratories. Descriptive statistics summarized the percentage of unacceptable submissions and sources of failure for volume linearity and syringe DLCO check maneuvers. Spearman's rho described the correlation between site-specific unacceptable submission rates, and both days between training and the first unacceptable submission and the days between training and first submission. Results: The unacceptable submission rate from 5,083 volume linearity assessments was 10% compared with a 6.2% rate from 4,992 syringe DLCO check maneuvers. Aggregate volume linearity rates of procedural errors (5.8%) and equipment errors (6.2%) were similar, whereas there were more syringe DLCO check equipment errors (5.9%) than procedural errors (0.78%). The time between training and submitting a QC test was not related to overall unacceptable submission rates for volume linearity and syringe DLCO check, rsp = 0.11, P = .27 and rsp = 0.19, P = .052, respectively. Higher unacceptable rates occurred when the first QC failure occurred close to the completion of training for volume linearity and syringe DLCO check, rsp = -0.41, P < .001 and rsp = -0.38, P < .001, respectively. Conclusions: A single QC training session does not adequately prepare technologists to conduct QC. Technologists need clear and consistent guidelines for conducting QC procedures and regular follow-up from experts to properly interpret QC findings, resolve equipment problems, and assure their testing systems are in-control.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
liyan完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
嗯啊完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
酷波er应助immm采纳,获得10
5秒前
优雅含莲完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
呜啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
lulu8809完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
二十五完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
romeo完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
kaka完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
Akim应助xialuoke采纳,获得10
11秒前
昏睡的蟠桃应助guoxingliu采纳,获得200
12秒前
慕容松完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
romeo发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
ss_hHe完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
zjcomposite完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
nn发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
css完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
1111完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
敏er好学完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
细腻的谷秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
独特的易形完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
yangyangyang完成签到,获得积分0
21秒前
yirenli完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
叶子完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
angel完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
正经大善人完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
动听的秋白完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
汉堡包应助biofresh采纳,获得30
27秒前
自然归尘完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
缓慢海蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
liyiren完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
zhaopeipei完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038201
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575940
关于积分的说明 11373987
捐赠科研通 3305747
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819274
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892662
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022