A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy After Failed Bowel Preparation

比沙科迪 医学 结肠镜检查 耐受性 随机对照试验 内科学 胃肠病学 泻药 泻药 不利影响 养生 外科 便秘 结直肠癌 癌症
作者
Michael Sey,Daniel von Renteln,Richard Sultanian,Cassandra McDonald,Mickaël Bouin,Nilesh Chande,Amindeep Sandhu,Brian Yan,Myriam Martel,Alan Barkun
出处
期刊:Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (6): e1283-e1291 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.015
摘要

Failed bowel preparation for colonoscopy occurs commonly, but the optimal regimen for the subsequent attempt is unknown. High-volume preparations often are used but are not well studied. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 2 regimens for use after failed bowel preparation.A multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients who previously failed bowel preparation despite adequate compliance. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 split polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimens, preceded by 15 mg bisacodyl: PEG 2 L the evening before and 2 L the day of colonoscopy (PEG 2+2L+bisacodyl), or 4 L and 2 L (PEG 4+2L+bisacodyl). All patients followed a low-fiber diet on both the third and second day before the procedure, followed by a clear fluid diet the day before and the morning of the colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation, defined as a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale total score of 6 or higher, with all segment scores of 2 or higher. Secondary outcomes included adenoma detection rate, advanced adenoma detection rate, sessile serrated lesion detection, cecal intubation rate, tolerability, and adverse events.A total of 196 subjects were randomized at 4 academic centers in Canada (mean age, 60.7 y; SD, 11.4 y; 44.9% were women). There were no significant differences between the PEG 2+2L+bisacodyl and the PEG 4+2L+bisacodyl groups in achieving adequate bowel preparation (91.2% vs 87.6%; P = .44). There were no significant differences with regard to mean adenoma detection rate (37.4% vs 31.5%; P = .41), advanced adenoma detection rate (18.7% vs 11.2%; P = .16), sessile serrated lesion detection (8.8% vs 5.6%; P = .41), and cecal intubation rate (96.7% vs 92.1%; P = .19). The 2 regimens were similarly well tolerated, but PEG 2+2L+bisacodyl was associated with a higher willingness to repeat the bowel preparation (91.2% vs 66.2%; P < .001).Split-dose 4 L-PEG with 15 mg bisacodyl, along with dietary restrictions, has similar efficacy as a higher-volume preparation, and should be considered for patients who previously failed bowel preparation (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02976805).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
烩面大师发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
北欧海盗完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
赘婿应助如初采纳,获得10
1秒前
lmy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
靓丽安珊完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
orixero应助勤恳的从波采纳,获得10
2秒前
hayden发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
1234hai发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
鹿七七啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
jojodan应助大大怪采纳,获得10
3秒前
fmd123发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
可爱的函函应助sonder采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
xingyi发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
祖f完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ChengYonghui完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
所所应助kkk采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
boltos完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
彭于彦祖应助liars采纳,获得30
7秒前
7秒前
范范范发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
脑洞疼应助qweasdzxcqwe采纳,获得30
8秒前
8秒前
思苇完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
飘逸秋荷发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
lw发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
简单酸奶完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
dddd完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
林小雨完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
a水爱科研完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
干脆苹果发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
乐观囧发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 330
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3986829
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3529292
关于积分的说明 11244137
捐赠科研通 3267685
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1803843
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 881223
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 808600