医学
颅内压
高原(数学)
经颅多普勒
内科学
脑血流
血流
心脏病学
神经组阅片室
舒张期
脉冲压力
流速
神经学
血压
麻醉
数学
数学分析
精神科
放松(心理学)
作者
András Czigler,Marta Fedriga,Erta Beqiri,Afroditi D Lalou,Leanne Calviello,Manuel Cabeleira,Péter Tóth,Peter Smielewski,Marek Czosnyka
出处
期刊:Acta neurochirurgica
日期:2021-01-01
卷期号:: 23-25
标识
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_5
摘要
SummaryMany transcranial Doppler ultrasonography devices estimate the mean flow velocity (FVm) by using the traditional formula (FVsystolic + 2 × FVdiastolic)/3 instead of a more accurate formula calculating it as the time integral of the current flow velocities divided by the integration period. We retrospectively analyzed flow velocity and intracranial pressure signals containing plateau waves (transient intracranial hypertension), which were collected from 14 patients with a traumatic brain injury. The differences in FVm and its derivative pulsatility index (PI) calculated with the two different methods were determined. We found that during plateau waves, when the intracranial pressure (ICP) rose, the error in FVm and PI increased significantly from the baseline to the plateau (from 4.6 ± 2.4 to 9.8 ± 4.9 cm/s, P < 0.05). Similarly, the error in PI also increased during plateau waves (from 0.11 ± 0.07 to 0.44 ± 0.24, P < 0.005). These effects were most likely due to changes in the pulse waveform during increased ICP, which alter the relationship between systolic, diastolic, and mean flow velocities. If a change in the mean ICP is expected, then calculation of FVm with the traditional formula is not recommended.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI