Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.

医学 协商一致会议 普通外科 切除术 医学物理学 外科 内科学
作者
Go Wakabayashi,Daniel Cherqui,David A. Geller,Joseph E. Buell,Hironori Kaneko,Ho‐Seong Han,Horacio J. Asbun,Nicholas O’Rourke,Minoru Tanabe,Alan J. Koffron,Allan Tsung,Olivier Soubrane,Marcel Autran C. Machado,Brice Gayet,Roberto Troisi,Patrick Pessaux,Ronald M. van Dam,Olivier Scatton,Mohammad Abu Hilal,Giulio Belli,Choon Hyuck David Kwon,Bjørn Edwin,Gi Hong Choi,Luca Aldrighetti,Xiu-jun Cai,Sean Clemy,Kuo‐Hsin Chen,Michael R. Schoen,Atsushi Sugioka,C N Tang,Paulo Herman,Juan Pekolj,Xiaoping Chen,Ibrahim Dagher,William R. Jarnagin,Masakazu Yamamoto,R Strong,P. Jagannath,Chung-Mau Lo,Pierre-Alain Clavien,Norihiro Kokudo,Jeffrey Barkun,Steven M. Strasberg
出处
期刊:Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe - HAL - Diderot 卷期号:261 (4): 619-29 被引量:1207
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000001184
摘要

The use of laparoscopy for liver surgery is increasing rapidly. The Second International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resections (LLR) was held in Morioka, Japan, from October 4 to 6, 2014 to evaluate the current status of laparoscopic liver surgery and to provide recommendations to aid its future development. Seventeen questions were addressed. The first 7 questions focused on outcomes that reflect the benefits and risks of LLR. These questions were addressed using the Zurich-Danish consensus conference model in which the literature and expert opinion were weighed by a 9-member jury, who evaluated LLR outcomes using GRADE and a list of comparators. The jury also graded LLRs by the Balliol Classification of IDEAL. The jury concluded that MINOR LLRs had become standard practice (IDEAL 3) and that MAJOR liver resections were still innovative procedures in the exploration phase (IDEAL 2b). Continued cautious introduction of MAJOR LLRs was recommended. All of the evidence available for scrutiny was of LOW quality by GRADE, which prompted the recommendation for higher quality evaluative studies. The last 10 questions focused on technical questions and the recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion. Recommendations were made regarding preoperative evaluation, bleeding controls, transection methods, anatomic approaches, and equipment. Both experts and jury recognized the need for a formal structure of education for those interested in performing major laparoscopic LLR because of the steep learning curve.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
丘比特应助汤米bb采纳,获得10
1秒前
丘比特应助陶醉发箍采纳,获得10
4秒前
闪闪千兰发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
7秒前
邱夫斯基发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
华仔应助小王采纳,获得10
8秒前
xyf发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
9秒前
舒适斑马完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
畅快毒娘完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
赘婿应助尊敬的芷卉采纳,获得10
13秒前
逐梦ing完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
易安发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
舒适斑马发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
畅快毒娘发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
17秒前
Singularity应助薛雨佳采纳,获得10
18秒前
天天快乐应助醒醒采纳,获得10
19秒前
小王发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
千寻发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
科研通AI5应助1222采纳,获得20
25秒前
dongguoxia发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
小菜鸡发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
眯眯眼的衬衫应助shine0king采纳,获得10
26秒前
香蕉觅云应助nadeem采纳,获得10
28秒前
Hello应助呆头鹅采纳,获得10
28秒前
搜集达人应助江峰采纳,获得10
28秒前
Hello应助nbnbaaa采纳,获得10
28秒前
2311发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
星辰大海应助不吃西瓜采纳,获得10
28秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 1000
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 104th edition 1000
Izeltabart tapatansine - AdisInsight 600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 500
An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3769687
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3314764
关于积分的说明 10173625
捐赠科研通 3030095
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1662612
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 795054
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 756519