Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Medicine

医学 四分位间距 医学诊断 家庭医学 置信区间 人工智能 外科 病理 内科学 计算机科学
作者
Bethany Stai,Nicholas Heller,Sean McSweeney,Jack Rickman,Paul Blake,Ranveer Vasdev,Zach Edgerton,Resha Tejpaul,Matt Peterson,Joel Rosenberg,Arveen Kalapara,Subodh Regmi,Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos,Christopher Weight
出处
期刊:Journal of Endourology [Mary Ann Liebert]
卷期号:34 (10): 1041-1048 被引量:59
标识
DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0137
摘要

Objective: To understand better the public perception and comprehension of medical technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic surgery. In addition to this, to identify sensitivity to their use to ensure acceptability and quality of counseling. Subjects and Methods: A survey was conducted on a convenience sample of visitors to the MN Minnesota State Fair (n = 264). Participants were randomized to receive one of two similar surveys. In the first, a diagnosis was made by a physician and in the second by an AI application to compare confidence in human and computer-based diagnosis. Results: The median age of participants was 45 (interquartile range 28–59), 58% were female (n = 154) vs 42% male (n = 110), 69% had completed at least a bachelor's degree, 88% were Caucasian (n = 233) vs 12% ethnic minorities (n = 31) and were from 12 states, mostly from the Upper Midwest. Participants had nearly equal trust in AI vs physician diagnoses. However, they were significantly more likely to trust an AI diagnosis of cancer over a doctor's diagnosis when responding to the version of the survey that suggested that an AI could make medical diagnoses (p = 9.32e-06). Though 55% of respondents (n = 145) reported that they were uncomfortable with automated robotic surgery, the majority of the individuals surveyed (88%) mistakenly believed that partially autonomous surgery was already happening. Almost all (94%, n = 249) stated that they would be willing to pay for a review of medical imaging by an AI if available. Conclusion: Most participants express confidence in AI providing medical diagnoses, sometimes even over human physicians. Participants generally express concern with surgical AI, but they mistakenly believe that it is already being performed. As AI applications increase in medical practice, health care providers should be cognizant of the potential amount of misinformation and sensitivity that patients have to how such technology is represented.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
sunshitao发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
顾矜应助努力飞的麻雀采纳,获得10
1秒前
iiiiii发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
pagoda完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
李健应助77777采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
哐哐哐铛发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
Cc完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Hello应助小鱼采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
Singularity应助孙兆杰采纳,获得10
8秒前
Singularity应助狂野电源采纳,获得10
9秒前
Hello应助嘻嘻采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
孙宏完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
wear88发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
无花果应助cjc采纳,获得10
13秒前
葡萄成熟应助巴西琉斯采纳,获得10
14秒前
漂亮的素发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
追寻的梦凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
ccc完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
坐看云起发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
搜集达人应助zyp采纳,获得10
20秒前
wear88完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
Troye发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
FashionBoy应助漂亮的素采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
凌依萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
小栗子最爱吃糖完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
28秒前
温柔惜筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
高分求助中
The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Second Edition, 2024) 1050
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY & SKINCARE PRACTICE 388
Case Research: The Case Writing Process 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3141752
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2792736
关于积分的说明 7804057
捐赠科研通 2449017
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1303050
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626718
版权声明 601260