Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps.

Purpose To evaluate preparation designs of compromised cusps and whether or not they influence masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial-coverage restorations (PCRs) luted on mandibular molars. Materials and methods Sixty-four caries-free molars were equally divided into four groups. Control group NP received no preparation (NP). Group B-IN received a basic inlay (IN) preparation with buccal (B) cusp conservation and occlusal reduction of both lingual cusps. Group B-ON was prepared in the same way, except buccal cusps were prepared with an angle of 45 degrees to the occlusal plane (buccal onlay). Group B-OV preparation was similar to group B-ON, but buccal cusps received a further shoulder preparation on the buccal aspect (buccal overlap). Forty-eight all-ceramic IPS e.max Press PCRs were fabricated and luted adhesively. Specimens underwent mouth-motion fatigue (1.2 million cycles, 1.6 Hz, 49 N) and 5500 thermal cycles (5 degrees C/55 degrees C). Fracture patterns were observed. Surviving specimens were loaded until fracture. Marginal discrepancies were examined. Results Only one specimen of group B-ON fractured during fatigue. Median fracture loads (N) [IQR = x(.25) - x(.75)]: group NP = 1604 N [1182-1851 N], group B-IN = 1307 N [1262-1587N], group B-ON = 1396 N [817-1750N], group B-OV = 1205 N [1096-1542N]. No significant differences in fracture resistance were found between restored molars and unprepared teeth (p _ 0.18). Different preparation designs showed no significant influence on PCR fracture resistance. Mouth-motion fatigue caused a significanty decrease of marginal accuracy in groups B-IN (p = 0.009) and B-ON (p = 0.008). Marginal discrepancy values of groups B-IN and B-OV were significantly different after fatigue (p = 0.045). Conclusion Ceramic coverage of compromised cusps did not demonstrate an increase of fracture resistance after fatigue when compared to less invasive partial-coverage restorations. However, enhanced exposure of restoration margins to occlusal wear could result in more extensive marginal discrepancies.