作者
María Colmenero,Javier Boz,José Bernabeu Wittel,Esther Roé,M Feito Rodríguez,María Asunción Vicente‐Villa,Ana Martín‐Santiago,Sara Isabel Palencia Pérez,Antoni Azon,Marta Valdivielso‐Ramos,Antonio Torrelo,Ana Isabel Sánchez Moya,Minia Campos,Gloria Garnacho‐Saucedo,José Manuel Azaña Defez,Ángel Vera Casaño,Jesús Tercedor‐Sánchez,Rebeca Alcalá,María Antonia González‐Enseyat,Aniza Giacaman,Ángela Hernández‐Martin,María Teresa Monserrat García,Ana Bauzá,Javier Domínguez‐Cruz,Ignacio Garcia Doval,Mercè Grau-Pérez
摘要
Background Guidelines and expert recommendations on infantile hemangiomas (IH) are aimed at increasing homogeneity in clinical decisions based on the risk of sequelae. Objective The objective was to analyze the inter- and intra-observer agreement among pediatric dermatologists in the choice of treatment for IH. Methods We performed a cross-sectional inter-rater and intra-rater agreement study within the Spanish infantile hemangioma registry. Twenty-seven pediatric dermatologists were invited to participate in a survey with 50 clinical vignettes randomly selected within the registry. Each vignette contained a picture of an infantile hemangioma with a clinical description. Raters chose therapy among observation, topical timolol, or oral propranolol. The same survey reordered was completed 1 month later to assess intra-rater agreement. Vignettes were stratified into hemangioma risk categories following the Spanish consensus on IH. The agreement was measured using kappa statistics appropriate for the type of data (Gwet's AC1 coefficient and Gwet's paired t test). Results Twenty-four dermatologists completed the survey. Vignettes represented 7.8% of the Spanish hemangioma registry. The inter-rater agreement on the treatment decision was fair (AC1 = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30–0.47). When stratified by risk category, good agreement was reached for high-risk hemangiomas (AC1 = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.51–1.00), whereas for intermediate- and low-risk categories, the agreement was only fair (AC1 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16–0.46 and AC1 = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.27–0.48, respectively). Propranolol was the main option for high-risk hemangiomas (86.4%), timolol for intermediate-risk (36.8%), and observation for low-risk ones (55.9%). The intra-rater agreement was good. The inter-rater agreement between pediatric dermatologists on the treatment of IH is only fair. Variability was most significant with intermediate- and low-risk hemangiomas.