调解
观察研究
术语
背景(考古学)
医疗保健
医学
随机对照试验
数据科学
计算机科学
社会学
社会科学
病理
古生物学
经济
哲学
生物
经济增长
语言学
作者
Priscila Corraini,Morten Olsen,Lars Pedersen,Olaf M. Dekkers,Jan P. Vandenbroucke
摘要
We revisited the three interrelated epidemiological concepts of effect modification, interaction and mediation for clinical investigators and examined their applicability when using research databases. The standard methods that are available to assess interaction, effect modification and mediation are explained and exemplified. For each concept, we first give a simple "best-case" example from a randomized controlled trial, followed by a structurally similar example from an observational study using research databases. Our explanation of the examples is based on recent theoretical developments and insights in the context of large health care databases. Terminology is sometimes ambiguous for what constitutes effect modification and interaction. The strong assumptions underlying the assessment of interaction, and particularly mediation, require clinicians and epidemiologists to take extra care when conducting observational studies in the context of health care databases. These strong assumptions may limit the applicability of interaction and mediation assessments, at least until the biases and limitations of these assessments when using large research databases are clarified.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI