Utility and Comparative Performance of Current Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models as Postoperative Medical Support Chatbots in Aesthetic Surgery

医学 心理干预 杠杆(统计) 鉴别诊断 外科 病史 介绍(产科) 精神科 人工智能 病理 计算机科学
作者
Jad Abi‐Rafeh,Nader Henry,Hong Hao Xu,Brian Bassiri-Tehrani,Adel Arezki,Roy Kazan,Mirko S. Gilardino,Foad Nahai
出处
期刊:Aesthetic Surgery Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:44 (8): 889-896 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/asj/sjae025
摘要

Abstract Background Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way plastic surgeons and their patients can access and leverage artificial intelligence (AI). Objectives The present study aims to compare the performance of 2 current publicly available and patient-accessible LLMs in the potential application of AI as postoperative medical support chatbots in an aesthetic surgeon's practice. Methods Twenty-two simulated postoperative patient presentations following aesthetic breast plastic surgery were devised and expert-validated. Complications varied in their latency within the postoperative period, as well as urgency of required medical attention. In response to each patient-reported presentation, Open AI's ChatGPT and Google's Bard, in their unmodified and freely available versions, were objectively assessed for their comparative accuracy in generating an appropriate differential diagnosis, most-likely diagnosis, suggested medical disposition, treatments or interventions to begin from home, and/or red flag signs/symptoms indicating deterioration. Results ChatGPT cumulatively and significantly outperformed Bard across all objective assessment metrics examined (66% vs 55%, respectively; P < .05). Accuracy in generating an appropriate differential diagnosis was 61% for ChatGPT vs 57% for Bard (P = .45). ChatGPT asked an average of 9.2 questions on history vs Bard’s 6.8 questions (P < .001), with accuracies of 91% vs 68% reporting the most-likely diagnosis, respectively (P < .01). Appropriate medical dispositions were suggested with accuracies of 50% by ChatGPT vs 41% by Bard (P = .40); appropriate home interventions/treatments with accuracies of 59% vs 55% (P = .94), and red flag signs/symptoms with accuracies of 79% vs 54% (P < .01), respectively. Detailed and comparative performance breakdowns according to complication latency and urgency are presented. Conclusions ChatGPT represents the superior LLM for the potential application of AI technology in postoperative medical support chatbots. Imperfect performance and limitations discussed may guide the necessary refinement to facilitate adoption.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
moony完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
打打应助健壮的繁星采纳,获得10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助kjding采纳,获得10
2秒前
JIASHOUSHOU完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
星流xx完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
贺丞完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
顺利萧完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
14秒前
min17发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
怕孤独的乌龟完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
鲲鹏戏龙发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
华仔应助gaint采纳,获得10
18秒前
IBMffff应助熊一只采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
Tonnyjing应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
Tonnyjing应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
压缩应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
Lin发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
wanci应助踏实的道消采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
hcmsaobang2001完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
集力申完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
plutozstar关注了科研通微信公众号
26秒前
情怀应助Lin采纳,获得10
27秒前
零零二完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
song发布了新的文献求助30
28秒前
30秒前
31秒前
刻苦大门完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
可爱的函函应助范小小采纳,获得10
32秒前
33秒前
35秒前
Lin完成签到,获得积分20
40秒前
jeffery111发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 1500
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 799
Queer Politics in Times of New Authoritarianisms: Popular Culture in South Asia 500
Livre et militantisme : La Cité éditeur 1958-1967 500
Retention of title in secured transactions law from a creditor's perspective: A comparative analysis of selected (non-)functional approaches 500
高温高压条件下金刚石内部缺陷的形成机制及调控 310
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3060611
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2716064
关于积分的说明 7447978
捐赠科研通 2361978
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1251726
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 607853
版权声明 596515