清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

No genetic causal association between COVID‐19 infection, hypogonadism, and male infertility

不育 男性不育 孟德尔随机化 单核苷酸多态性 人口 睾酮(贴片) 医学 性激素结合球蛋白 生理学 妇科 生物 遗传学 内科学 基因型 怀孕 激素 雄激素 遗传变异 环境卫生 基因
作者
Yang Xiong,Xiaokun Hu,Yangchang Zhang,Feng Qin,Jiuhong Yuan
出处
期刊:MedComm [Wiley]
卷期号:4 (5) 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1002/mco2.389
摘要

Dear Editor: SARS-CoV-2 infection has been observed to induce testicular damage, leading to a reduction in serum testosterone levels and sperm count.1 While the potential for hypogonadism and subfertility has been acknowledged, it remains inadequately assessed. Clinical studies present inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between COVID-19 infection, hypogonadism, and male infertility.2 The true association between COVID-19 infection, hypogonadism, and infertility remains unclear. To address the limitations of observational design, we employed the Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach in this study. MR is a method using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as genetic proxies to substitute the exposures (i.e., COVID-19 infection) and the outcomes (i.e., testosterone and male infertility).3 During gestation, SNPs closely associated with COVID-19 infection, hypogonadism, and male infertility are distributed at random, which are not interfered by postnatal confounders.3 Therefore, within the framework of MR, patients with COVID-19 infection are naturally randomized, facilitating the investigation of the risk of hypogonadism and infertility. The Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWASs) of COVID-19 susceptibility (COVID vs. population), hospitalization (hospitalized COVID vs. population), and severity (very severe cases vs. population) were retrieved from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative.4 These GWASs included 1,683,768, 1,887,658, and 1,388,342 participants, respectively. The genetic associations of total testosterone (199,569 males), bioavailable testosterone (BAT, 184,205 males), and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG, 185,221 males) and male infertility (680 cases and 72,799 controls) were extracted from previous GWASs and the FinnGen biobank.5 The detailed information of instrumental variables (IVs, p < 5 × 10−8) is displayed in Table S1. Further information regarding the GWASs and the downloading websites for the raw data can be found in Tables S2 and S3. p < 0.05/n (0.05/12 = 0.0042) was considered statistically significant. The statistical analyses are detailed in Supporting Information. Our findings did not establish a causal link between COVID-19 infection and male infertility. The Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method disclosed that the odds ratios (ORs) of male infertility were 0.74 for susceptibility (95% CI = 0.32–1.69, p = 0.472), 0.79 for hospitalization (95% CI = 0.53–1.19, p = 0.268), and 0.87 for severity (95% CI = 0.69–1.09, p = 0.220), respectively (Figure 1A). The other four methods including Maximum Likelihood, MR-Egger, MR-RAPS (Robust Adjusted Profile Score), and Weighted Median were in line with the IVW model, reporting no causal association between COVID-19 infection and male infertility (all p > 0.05). Figure 1B–D illustrates an inverse correlation between the SNP effects on COVID-19 infection (susceptibility, hospitalization, and severity) and male infertility. In Table S4, the intercept terms of MR-Egger regression are close to zero (all p > 0.05), suggesting no pleiotropy. Additionally, the mean F statistics of selected IVs were greater than 48, indicating a lower likelihood of bias from weak IVs. In Figure S1, the funnel plots show symmetrical distributions of IVs. The IVW approach also reported no heterogeneity (all p > 0.05). In Figure 1E, the IVW method reveals that genetically proxied COVID-19 infection has no impact on testosterone levels (β = 0.0148 for COVID-19 susceptibility, 0.0394 for COVID-19 hospitalization, and 0.0070 for COVID-19 severity, all p > 0.05). The findings remained insignificant in most of the sensitivity analyses (all p > 0.05). The scatter plots did not exhibit a negative trend between the SNP effects on COVID-19 infection and testosterone levels (Figure S2A–C). Of note, there was significant heterogeneity in the IVs (Figure S2D–F), without pleiotropy (Table S4). Similarly, the IVW estimator found no significant associations between COVID-19 infection and BAT by the IVW method in Figure 1E (β = 0.0190 for COVID-19 susceptibility, −0.0113 for COVID-19 hospitalization, and 0.0160 for COVID-19 severity, all p > 0.05). The other four methods obtained similar results, providing no evidence that COVID-19 infection leads to a decrease in BAT levels (all p > 0.05). In Figure S3A–C, no apparent downward trend is observed between the SNP effects on COVID-19 infection and BAT. In Figure S3D–F and Table S4, significant heterogeneities are observed for the IVs of COVID-19 hospitalization and severity (p < 0.05), without evidence of pleiotropy (p > 0.05). No significant causal relationship was found between COVID-19 susceptibility and SHBG levels (β = −0.0350, 95% CI = −0.0769 to 0.0069, p = 0.101; Figure 1E). However, the IVW estimator revealed that genetically predicted COVID-19 hospitalization and severity were associated with decreased levels of SHBG (β = −0.0350, p = 0.004 and β = −0.0273, p = 0.003, respectively). The consistency in the magnitude and direction of results across MR-RAPS, Weighted Median, and Maximum Likelihood methods substantiates the risk impact of COVID-19 hospitalization and severity on SHBG levels. In Figure S4A–C, the scatter plots visualize a downward trend regarding the SNP effects between COVID-19 infection and SHBG. In Figure S4D–F and Table S4, no significant heterogeneity and pleiotropy are detected (all p > 0.05). We further performed reversed MR analyses to rule out reverse causality. In Figure S5, the IVW model shows that the increment of total testosterone, BAT, and SHBG concentrations have no effect on COVID-19 infection (susceptibility, hospitalization, and severity, all p > 0.05). The mean F statistics were all greater than 80, showing adequate strengths of IVs. In addition, the intercept terms of MR-Egger regression were close to null, indicating no pleiotropy (all p > 0.05). As shown in Figure S6, significant heterogeneities in the IVs for total testosterone, BAT, and SHBG are observed. Thus, the random-effect IVW model was used to estimate the causal effects. Notably, our study found a significant association between COVID-19 infection and decreased SHBG levels. Previous reports have associated COVID-19 infection with hepatic dysfunction.6 Given that SHBG is synthesized in the liver and transports sex hormones in serum, liver dysfunction may lead to decreased SHBG. A decline in SHBG indicates a higher concentration of free testosterone and a lower likelihood of hypogonadism and male infertility. In conclusion, our study provides causal evidence that genetically proxied COVID-19 infection does not increase the risk of hypogonadism and male infertility. Jiuhong Yuan proposed the research topic and supervised the study. Yang Xiong, Xiaokun Hu, and Yangchang Zhang performed the statistical analysis. The manuscript was written by Yang Xiong and Xiaokun Hu, and revised by Jiuhong Yuan and Feng Qin. All authors have read and approved for the final manuscript. We thank Ms. Xiaoyingzi Huang of the Andrology Lab, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, for technical assistance. The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study. The entire data from Mendelian Randomization is publicly accessible (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects in the original genome-wide association studies. The entire data from Mendelian Randomization is publicly accessible (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
5秒前
8秒前
16秒前
开放的果汁完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
33秒前
桐桐应助开放的果汁采纳,获得10
36秒前
香蕉觅云应助俏皮的芒果采纳,获得10
39秒前
40秒前
49秒前
1分钟前
淡定友有发布了新的文献求助30
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Sandstorm发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.1应助淡定友有采纳,获得10
1分钟前
淡定友有完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Ricardo完成签到 ,获得积分0
2分钟前
2分钟前
铁风筝芳芳完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
wyx发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
4分钟前
ENIGMA__K发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
唐禹嘉完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
HalaMadrid发布了新的文献求助20
4分钟前
4分钟前
深情安青应助ENIGMA__K采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
微卫星不稳定完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
搜集达人应助RobinHahn采纳,获得10
4分钟前
李健应助HalaMadrid采纳,获得10
4分钟前
5分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6012890
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7574837
关于积分的说明 16139492
捐赠科研通 5159928
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2763218
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1742779
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634139