Enteral Nutrition Versus a Combination of Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

医学 肠外营养 荟萃分析 重症监护医学 重症监护室 随机对照试验 机械通风 肠内给药 系统回顾 病危 不利影响 梅德林 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Paraskevi Papanikolaou,Xenophon Theodoridis,Androniki Papaemmanouil,Niki Papageorgiou,Alexandra Tsankof,Anna‐Bettina Haidich,Christos Savopoulos,Κωνσταντίνος Τζιόμαλος
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Medicine [MDPI AG]
卷期号:14 (3): 991-991
标识
DOI:10.3390/jcm14030991
摘要

Background/Objectives: Uncertainty persists about the best methods and timing for providing medical nutrition therapy (MNT) in the acute phase of critical illness. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews to examine and appraise the findings of the current systematic reviews and performed an updated meta-analysis incorporating newly published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate whether enteral nutrition (EN) is superior to the combination of EN and parenteral nutrition (PN) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We systematically searched three databases to retrieve systematic reviews and RCTs. Two independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment processes. The random effects model was utilized to synthesize the data regarding primary and secondary outcomes. Results: There was no difference between the two interventions regarding the efficacy and safety endpoints, apart from the bloodstream infections, which were found to be increased in the group that received the combination of EN+PN (RR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.03 to 1.56, PI = 0.91 to 1.77, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: According to the present overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, there was no observed benefit on mortality, length of ICU stay or hospitalization, and duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients receiving a combination of EN and PN in comparison to those receiving sole enteral nutrition in the ICU. Furthermore, no difference was observed in the rates of respiratory infections as well as the appearance of adverse events, such as vomiting and diarrhea. On the other hand, there was an increase in bloodstream infection rates in patients who received EN+PN compared to EN alone. Due to the limited implications of the results in clinical practice, further research is needed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
着急的黄豆完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
屹男完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
土豆你个西红柿完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
大脑停工应助2333采纳,获得10
1秒前
heitao完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Flyzhang完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Zhihu完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
干净的琦应助light采纳,获得10
2秒前
lnww完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
115566完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
munashe完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
0713完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
大胆人英完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Hina完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
玛卡巴卡完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
ppttyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
上官沅发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
hh完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
顾矜应助泡泡啰叽采纳,获得10
4秒前
ruilong发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
木木完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
阔达苡完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
温暖的蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
蓝白胖次哇完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
levitt233完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
闪蓝之光完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
阿芙乐尔完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
nanxun完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
历史真相发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
dfgv完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
小王同学完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
1235完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
lili完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Relation between chemical structure and local anesthetic action: tertiary alkylamine derivatives of diphenylhydantoin 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Principles of town planning : translating concepts to applications 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6066844
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7899104
关于积分的说明 16324083
捐赠科研通 5208598
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2786325
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1769077
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1647824