ChatGPT and large language model (LLM) chatbots: The current state of acceptability and a proposal for guidelines on utilization in academic medicine

医学 指南 梅德林 英语 病历 医学教育 人工智能 计算机科学 病理 心理学 内科学 政治学 数学教育 法学
作者
Jin K. Kim,Michael Chua,Mandy Rickard,Armando J. Lorenzo
出处
期刊:Journal of Pediatric Urology [Elsevier]
卷期号:19 (5): 598-604 被引量:62
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.05.018
摘要

There is currently no clear consensus on the standards for using large language models such as ChatGPT in academic medicine. Hence, we performed a scoping review of available literature to understand the current state of LLM use in medicine and to provide a guideline for future utilization in academia.A scoping review of the literature was performed through a Medline search on February 16, 2023 using a combination of keywords including artificial intelligence, machine learning, natural language processing, generative pre-trained transformer, ChatGPT, and large language model. There were no restrictions to language or date of publication. Records not pertaining to LLMs were excluded. Records pertaining to LLM ChatBots and ChatGPT were identified and evaluated separately. Among the records pertaining to LLM ChatBots and ChatGPT, those that suggest recommendations for ChatGPT use in academia were utilized to create guideline statements for ChatGPT and LLM use in academic medicine.A total of 87 records were identified. 30 records were not pertaining to large language models and were excluded. 54 records underwent a full-text review for evaluation. There were 33 records related to LLM ChatBots or ChatGPT.From assessing these texts, five guideline statements for LLM use was developed: (1) ChatGPT/LLM cannot be cited as an author in scientific manuscripts; (2) If use of ChatGPT/LLM are considered for use in academic work, author(s) should have at least a basic understanding of what ChatGPT/LLM is; (3) Do not use ChatGPT/LLM to produce entirety of text in manuscripts; humans must be held accountable for use of ChatGPT/LLM and contents created by ChatGPT/LLM should be meticulously verified by humans; (4) ChatGPT/LLMs may be used for editing and refining of text; (5) Any use of ChatGPT/LLM should be transparent and should be clearly outlined in scientific manuscripts and acknowledged.Future authors should remain mindful of the potential impact their academic work may have on healthcare and continue to uphold the highest ethical standards and integrity when utilizing ChatGPT/LLM.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ll发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
爆米花应助孙小雨采纳,获得10
1秒前
rrgogo发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
8R60d8应助善意小霸王采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
慕青应助YIEYA采纳,获得10
3秒前
橙子abcy完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
努力小周发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
pj发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
动听如之完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
rrgogo完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
ll完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
思源应助喜悦莛采纳,获得10
13秒前
鱼鳞飞飞发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
天天快乐应助Giggle采纳,获得30
15秒前
orixero应助小蒋采纳,获得10
15秒前
Lee2000发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
prtrichor599完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
万能图书馆应助鲸1107采纳,获得10
20秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
Singularity应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
巫凝天发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
852应助会武功的阿吉采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
23秒前
24秒前
pj完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
从容襄完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
ll发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
rrrrr发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
Tal发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3146297
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2797687
关于积分的说明 7825144
捐赠科研通 2454059
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1305990
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627630
版权声明 601503