Effect of Human Head Shape on the Risk of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Gaussian Process Regression-based Machine Learning Approach

创伤性脑损伤 主管(地质) 人口 百分位 人头 头部受伤 人工智能 医学 回归分析 计算机科学 统计 数学 外科 生物 物理 精神科 古生物学 吸收(声学) 环境卫生 声学
作者
Kshitiz Upadhyay,Roshan Jagani,Dimitris G. Giovanis,Ahmed Alshareef,Andrew K. Knutsen,Curtis L. Johnson,Aaron Carass,Philip V. Bayly,Michael D. Shields,K.T. Ramesh
出处
期刊:Military Medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:189 (Supplement_3): 608-617
标识
DOI:10.1093/milmed/usae199
摘要

ABSTRACT Introduction Computational head injury models are promising tools for understanding and predicting traumatic brain injuries. However, most available head injury models are “average” models that employ a single set of head geometry (e.g., 50th-percentile U.S. male) without considering variability in these parameters across the human population. A significant variability of head shapes exists in U.S. Army soldiers, evident from the Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel (ANSUR II). The objective of this study is to elucidate the effects of head shape on the predicted risk of traumatic brain injury from computational head injury models. Materials and Methods Magnetic resonance imaging scans of 25 human subjects are collected. These images are registered to the standard MNI152 brain atlas, and the resulting transformation matrix components (called head shape parameters) are used to quantify head shapes of the subjects. A generative machine learning model is used to generate 25 additional head shape parameter datasets to augment our database. Head injury models are developed for these head shapes, and a rapid injurious head rotation event is simulated to obtain several brain injury predictor variables (BIPVs): Peak cumulative maximum principal strain (CMPS), average CMPS, and the volume fraction of brain exceeding an injurious CMPS threshold. A Gaussian process regression model is trained between head shape parameters and BIPVs, which is then used to study the relative sensitivity of the various BIPVs on individual head shape parameters. We distinguish head shape parameters into 2 types: Scaling components ${T_{xx}}$, ${T_{yy}}$, and ${T_{zz}}$ that capture the breadth, length, and height of the head, respectively, and shearing components (${T_{xy}},{T_{xz}},{T_{yx}},{T_{yz}},{T_{zx}}$, and ${T_{zy}}$) that capture the relative skewness of the head shape. Results An overall positive correlation is evident between scaling components and BIPVs. Notably, a very high, positive correlation is seen between the BIPVs and the head volume. As an example, a 57% increase in peak CMPS was noted between the smallest and the largest investigated head volume parameters. The variation in shearing components ${T_{xy}},{T_{xz}},{T_{yx}},{T_{yz}},{T_{zx}}$, and ${T_{zy}}$ on average does not cause notable changes in the BIPVs. From the Gaussian process regression model, all 3 BIPVs showed an increasing trend with each of the 3 scaling components, but the BIPVs are found to be most sensitive to the height dimension of the head. From the Sobol sensitivity analysis, the ${T_{zz}}$ scaling parameter contributes nearly 60% to the total variance in peak and average CMPS; ${T_{yy}}$ contributes approximately 20%, whereas ${T_{xx}}$ contributes less than 5%. The remaining contribution is from the 6 shearing components. Unlike peak and average CMPS, the VF-CMPS BIPV is associated with relatively evenly distributed Sobol indices across the 3 scaling parameters. Furthermore, the contribution of shearing components on the total variance in this case is negligible. Conclusions Head shape has a considerable influence on the injury predictions of computational head injury models. Available “average” head injury models based on a 50th-percentile U.S. male are likely associated with considerable uncertainty. In general, larger head sizes correspond to greater BIPV magnitudes, which point to potentially a greater injury risk under rapid neck rotation for people with larger heads.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
leei完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
meng123发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
小马甲应助c123采纳,获得10
2秒前
莎莎士比亚完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
LOST完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
袁凯文发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
共享精神应助老菜鸟321采纳,获得10
5秒前
WUWEI发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
xiaoW完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
牛太虚完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
SciGPT应助科多兽骑士采纳,获得10
8秒前
10秒前
gjm完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
SciGPT应助zj采纳,获得10
11秒前
Ava应助阿湫采纳,获得10
11秒前
meng123完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
x5kyi完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
爆米花应助肖遥采纳,获得10
14秒前
Xx完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
17秒前
烟里戏完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
shuangfeng1853完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
林子青发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
20秒前
aa完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
CXC完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
22秒前
Zzz发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
上官若男应助袁凯文采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
褚晣完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
ATTENTION完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
周欣玙完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
学不懂数学应助as采纳,获得30
24秒前
传奇3应助YiWei采纳,获得10
25秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
Research on Disturbance Rejection Control Algorithm for Aerial Operation Robots 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038524
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576221
关于积分的说明 11374737
捐赠科研通 3305912
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819354
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892688
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815048