接口(物质)
服装
压缩(物理)
计算机科学
声学
材料科学
工程制图
机械工程
工程类
复合材料
物理
地理
毛细管数
考古
毛细管作用
作者
Christopher McManus,Prabhuraj D. Venkatraman,Gavin Sandercock
出处
期刊:Measurement
[Elsevier]
日期:2020-02-10
卷期号:156: 107592-107592
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107592
摘要
The interface pressure applied by compression clothing is an important measure in evaluating the efficacy of the bio-physical impact of compression. The aim was to compare two portable pneumatic pressure measuring devices (PicoPress and Kikuhime), against a non-portable, Hohenstein System (HOSY) reference standard, used by medical regulatory agencies. Interface pressure obtained in-vivo (calf) by the PicoPress and Kikuhime, were compared with HOSY. The mean bias and limits of agreement indicate the PicoPress satisfies the a priori thresholds for acceptable validity at the posterior and lateral orientation with calf stockings (−0.4[−3.3;2.5]; 0.5[−3.4;4.4] mmHg) and tights (0.2[−4.7;5.1]; 1.2[−0.3;5.4] mmHg) respectively. The Kikuhime did not satisfy thresholds for acceptable validity at any orientation, overestimating the pressure compared with HOSY. We recommend using the PicoPress, specifically at the posterior or lateral aspect of the calf. This is of particular relevance when the hosiery is applying relatively low levels of pressure, applicable to sports compression.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI