Professional Titles in Higher Education: Do They Matter to Students?

心理学 高等教育 语义差异 感知 社会心理学 身份(音乐) 短语 数学教育 教育学 语言学 政治学 声学 物理 哲学 神经科学 法学
作者
Vickie Shamp Ellis,Jon E. Travis
出处
期刊:College student journal 卷期号:41 (4): 1168-1182 被引量:4
链接
摘要

How students relate to educators' titles or lack thereof is a component of the student-teacher relationship virtually ignored in higher education research. The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of titles in academic relationships, with special focus given to how students respond to forms of address used by faculty in the higher education environment. By utilizing three dimensions of the Semantic Differential Technique, this study assessed college and university students' perceptions of the following: Mr./Ms., Dean, Dr., Professor, and last name only. Based on the findings of the study, students do perceive educators' titles as significantly distinct. Forms of address generate connotations that educators should consider as they initially introduce themselves to their students. ********** Professional title considerations involve social mandates that seem to decrease the uncertainty of interaction and to increase the realization that some individuals are intoxicated by titles--their own and/or others' (Harris, 1999; Holberg, Garza, Kelly, & Moses, 1994). Relationships are shaped, in part, around forms of address. In informal situations, people may often hear the phrase, Just call me (by my first name). According to Hawks (1977), relationships clearly represent types of structures, and a person's identity is directly related to such structures. Hawks described the true nature of things, not in terms of the things themselves, but in terms of the constructed and perceived relationships between them. Asking a person to use a first name indicates a different relationship form than expecting someone to use a title along with a last-name. Relationships with significant others in an individual's life form an individual's self-perceptions (Adler, Rosenfeld, Towne, & Proctor, 1998). Furthermore, as Lambert and Tucker (1976) alluded, illocutionary frameworks are thought of as containing hidden meanings. If one initiates or responds to a greeting in stereotypical fashion, the participants may not consciously think about the title within the greeting. However, when the stereotypical greeting is threatened (meaning one does not speak his/her part appropriately), then the meaning of the greeting becomes obtrusive and perhaps the centerpiece of the ensuing discussion (Parkin, 1979). An understanding of how and to what extent the educator's title makes the academic relationship more or less complicated for the student in higher education served as the axis of this study. Educators become important persons in students' lives at any level (Hargreaves, 1972; Adler et al., 1998). Therefore, students deserve and need a healthy student-educator climate. Professional mores in K-12 educational systems in the United States strongly influence and more often mandate the students' use of professional and/or courtesy titles when addressing educators. Many pedagogical instructors have taught educators that titles help define the authoritative position and set a tone of respect. In 1966, Sylwester, a K-12 pedagogical instructor, taught that a teacher's school name must begin with a Miss, Mrs., or Mr. Sylwesters' position may or may not adeptly transfer to the higher education arena. Not many higher education professors have been in pedagogical methods courses. Yet, college and university students often think their instructors' school names begin with a Dr., Dean, Professor, or Mr./Ms. Discovering more about students' attitudes regarding such titles can provide more insight into the learning atmosphere. Since the role of address plays a consequential part in interpersonal communication (DeLisle, 1993), and the student-teacher relationship is critical, the use of titles, or lack thereof, has emerged as a higher education practice worthy of investigation. In some college and university environments, students and professors consistently establish non-reciprocal patterns of address, and in other higher education environments, students and professors consistently use reciprocal patterns of address. …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
2秒前
美好善斓完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
JamesPei的应助被LHNini采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
DDvicky发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Samuel完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
十三州府完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
梓唯忧完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
小蘑菇的应助被炒面采纳,获得20
5秒前
852的应助被正直三颜采纳,获得10
6秒前
lsm发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Owen的应助被CYJ采纳,获得10
8秒前
cen完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
TYLZ的应助被xiaolizi采纳,获得20
10秒前
水溶C完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
Friday完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
GWP完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
我球呢完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
在水一方的应助被cen采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
人工智能小配方完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
热心雪一完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
TYLZ的应助被钟贵泉采纳,获得10
14秒前
领导范儿的应助被667采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
火炉猫猫完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
可靠橘子发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
lan147发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
万能图书馆的应助被DDvicky采纳,获得10
19秒前
火炉猫猫发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
The Student's Guide to Social Neuroscience 600
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
A Will for the Machine: Computerization, Automation, and the Arts in South Africa 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7811081
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9342785
关于积分的说明 20514212
捐赠科研通 7403993
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3329655
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2476408
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2348584