Professional Titles in Higher Education: Do They Matter to Students?

心理学 高等教育 语义差异 感知 社会心理学 身份(音乐) 短语 数学教育 教育学 语言学 政治学 声学 物理 哲学 神经科学 法学
作者
Vickie Shamp Ellis,Jon E. Travis
出处
期刊:College student journal 卷期号:41 (4): 1168-1182 被引量:4
链接
摘要

How students relate to educators' titles or lack thereof is a component of the student-teacher relationship virtually ignored in higher education research. The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of titles in academic relationships, with special focus given to how students respond to forms of address used by faculty in the higher education environment. By utilizing three dimensions of the Semantic Differential Technique, this study assessed college and university students' perceptions of the following: Mr./Ms., Dean, Dr., Professor, and last name only. Based on the findings of the study, students do perceive educators' titles as significantly distinct. Forms of address generate connotations that educators should consider as they initially introduce themselves to their students. ********** Professional title considerations involve social mandates that seem to decrease the uncertainty of interaction and to increase the realization that some individuals are intoxicated by titles--their own and/or others' (Harris, 1999; Holberg, Garza, Kelly, & Moses, 1994). Relationships are shaped, in part, around forms of address. In informal situations, people may often hear the phrase, Just call me (by my first name). According to Hawks (1977), relationships clearly represent types of structures, and a person's identity is directly related to such structures. Hawks described the true nature of things, not in terms of the things themselves, but in terms of the constructed and perceived relationships between them. Asking a person to use a first name indicates a different relationship form than expecting someone to use a title along with a last-name. Relationships with significant others in an individual's life form an individual's self-perceptions (Adler, Rosenfeld, Towne, & Proctor, 1998). Furthermore, as Lambert and Tucker (1976) alluded, illocutionary frameworks are thought of as containing hidden meanings. If one initiates or responds to a greeting in stereotypical fashion, the participants may not consciously think about the title within the greeting. However, when the stereotypical greeting is threatened (meaning one does not speak his/her part appropriately), then the meaning of the greeting becomes obtrusive and perhaps the centerpiece of the ensuing discussion (Parkin, 1979). An understanding of how and to what extent the educator's title makes the academic relationship more or less complicated for the student in higher education served as the axis of this study. Educators become important persons in students' lives at any level (Hargreaves, 1972; Adler et al., 1998). Therefore, students deserve and need a healthy student-educator climate. Professional mores in K-12 educational systems in the United States strongly influence and more often mandate the students' use of professional and/or courtesy titles when addressing educators. Many pedagogical instructors have taught educators that titles help define the authoritative position and set a tone of respect. In 1966, Sylwester, a K-12 pedagogical instructor, taught that a teacher's school name must begin with a Miss, Mrs., or Mr. Sylwesters' position may or may not adeptly transfer to the higher education arena. Not many higher education professors have been in pedagogical methods courses. Yet, college and university students often think their instructors' school names begin with a Dr., Dean, Professor, or Mr./Ms. Discovering more about students' attitudes regarding such titles can provide more insight into the learning atmosphere. Since the role of address plays a consequential part in interpersonal communication (DeLisle, 1993), and the student-teacher relationship is critical, the use of titles, or lack thereof, has emerged as a higher education practice worthy of investigation. In some college and university environments, students and professors consistently establish non-reciprocal patterns of address, and in other higher education environments, students and professors consistently use reciprocal patterns of address. …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
丰富凡白完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
雪白十三发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
liuww0778发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
3秒前
evans完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
asplD完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Orange应助梅雨季来信采纳,获得10
5秒前
testmanfuxk完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
白露发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
所所应助Spike采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
袁奇点完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
张希伦完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
彭于晏应助火星上初柳采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
刘传世发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
雪白十三完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
啾咪发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
桐桐应助牛儿牛儿采纳,获得10
17秒前
简单晓博发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
oldface7发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
乐乐应助刘传世采纳,获得10
19秒前
亦秋发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
可爱的函函应助白露采纳,获得10
20秒前
友好赛凤发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Hello应助ranke采纳,获得10
21秒前
科研通AI6.4应助陈新华采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 530
Lengua e imagen en la comunicación digital 500
A First Course in Options Pricing Theory 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7480667
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9073936
关于积分的说明 19350067
捐赠科研通 7097428
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3247448
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2416469
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2232806