Professional Titles in Higher Education: Do They Matter to Students?

心理学 高等教育 语义差异 感知 社会心理学 身份(音乐) 短语 数学教育 教育学 语言学 政治学 声学 物理 哲学 神经科学 法学
作者
Vickie Shamp Ellis,Jon E. Travis
出处
期刊:College student journal 卷期号:41 (4): 1168-1182 被引量:4
链接
摘要

How students relate to educators' titles or lack thereof is a component of the student-teacher relationship virtually ignored in higher education research. The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of titles in academic relationships, with special focus given to how students respond to forms of address used by faculty in the higher education environment. By utilizing three dimensions of the Semantic Differential Technique, this study assessed college and university students' perceptions of the following: Mr./Ms., Dean, Dr., Professor, and last name only. Based on the findings of the study, students do perceive educators' titles as significantly distinct. Forms of address generate connotations that educators should consider as they initially introduce themselves to their students. ********** Professional title considerations involve social mandates that seem to decrease the uncertainty of interaction and to increase the realization that some individuals are intoxicated by titles--their own and/or others' (Harris, 1999; Holberg, Garza, Kelly, & Moses, 1994). Relationships are shaped, in part, around forms of address. In informal situations, people may often hear the phrase, Just call me (by my first name). According to Hawks (1977), relationships clearly represent types of structures, and a person's identity is directly related to such structures. Hawks described the true nature of things, not in terms of the things themselves, but in terms of the constructed and perceived relationships between them. Asking a person to use a first name indicates a different relationship form than expecting someone to use a title along with a last-name. Relationships with significant others in an individual's life form an individual's self-perceptions (Adler, Rosenfeld, Towne, & Proctor, 1998). Furthermore, as Lambert and Tucker (1976) alluded, illocutionary frameworks are thought of as containing hidden meanings. If one initiates or responds to a greeting in stereotypical fashion, the participants may not consciously think about the title within the greeting. However, when the stereotypical greeting is threatened (meaning one does not speak his/her part appropriately), then the meaning of the greeting becomes obtrusive and perhaps the centerpiece of the ensuing discussion (Parkin, 1979). An understanding of how and to what extent the educator's title makes the academic relationship more or less complicated for the student in higher education served as the axis of this study. Educators become important persons in students' lives at any level (Hargreaves, 1972; Adler et al., 1998). Therefore, students deserve and need a healthy student-educator climate. Professional mores in K-12 educational systems in the United States strongly influence and more often mandate the students' use of professional and/or courtesy titles when addressing educators. Many pedagogical instructors have taught educators that titles help define the authoritative position and set a tone of respect. In 1966, Sylwester, a K-12 pedagogical instructor, taught that a teacher's school name must begin with a Miss, Mrs., or Mr. Sylwesters' position may or may not adeptly transfer to the higher education arena. Not many higher education professors have been in pedagogical methods courses. Yet, college and university students often think their instructors' school names begin with a Dr., Dean, Professor, or Mr./Ms. Discovering more about students' attitudes regarding such titles can provide more insight into the learning atmosphere. Since the role of address plays a consequential part in interpersonal communication (DeLisle, 1993), and the student-teacher relationship is critical, the use of titles, or lack thereof, has emerged as a higher education practice worthy of investigation. In some college and university environments, students and professors consistently establish non-reciprocal patterns of address, and in other higher education environments, students and professors consistently use reciprocal patterns of address. …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
emberlynn发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
蜂蜜柚子完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
oioioioioi发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
倷倷完成签到 ,获得积分0
2秒前
Kao应助webweb采纳,获得10
2秒前
易安发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Itazu发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
yvye完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
icNEo完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
蜂蜜柚子发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
缥缈的慕青完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
李健应助箫笙采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
桐桐应助彩色尔丝采纳,获得10
5秒前
英姑应助邱冯冯采纳,获得30
5秒前
不需要社会爹完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
yuming568发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
小蚊子发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
yyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
甜美网络完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
金磊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
史萌完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
书记发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科研小白发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
坚定尔蓝完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
十字丝完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
芝士薯片大盗完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
David完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
政治传播过程中的外交与说服——以中苏友好协会为例的历史考察 566
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7580624
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9160084
关于积分的说明 19597704
捐赠科研通 7163220
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3265890
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2430816
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2256882